#indiewebcamp 2011-11-11
2011-11-11 UTC
tantek, spinnerin, adam_w, voxpelli, voxpelli-laptop, peck_lx and xjjk joined the channel
# xjjk hello
# xjjk does anyone have any thoughts on the best way to archive Activity Streams data?
# xjjk so far, (for Atom) I'm making 1-entry documents…
# xjjk similar for JSON
# xjjk wondering if anyone has done anything different
peck_lx joined the channel
# xjjk voxpelli: it's easier to refer to the atom spec… I want to save each <entry>
# xjjk voxpelli: missed that, I'll take a look
# xjjk voxpelli: yes, that's a description
# xjjk voxpelli: I don't see anything about paging in http://activitystrea.ms/specs/json/1.0/
# voxpelli xjjk: Atom itself seems to define something they call "atom entry documents": http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287
# xjjk voxpelli: ah
# xjjk that's probably what I want… reading
# xjjk voxpelli: that's actually exactly what I wanted, thanks
# xjjk and was planning on doing
# xjjk just wanted to make sure it was valid
# xjjk voxpelli: thanks!
# xjjk with a URI, no idea… but in general you can just refer to the entry's <id>?
# xjjk on a random tangent… are there any RDF representations of AS in use? I saw some discussion on the mailing list but nothing past what seemed brainstorming
# xjjk would love to just have 1 HTML+RDFa document instead of HTML, Atom, JSON…
# xjjk I don't think so?
# xjjk most people do use a permalink as the ID
# voxpelli xjjk: check: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287#section-4.2.6
# voxpelli I used a tag uri for my id:s last time I created activitystreams: http://taguri.org/
# xjjk interesting
# xjjk from the semantic Web camp, you'd always use a dereferencable URL as an ID
# xjjk well, no, matter, not something I need to worry about
# xjjk voxpelli: thanks for the pointer to the Atom spec
peck_lx, josephboyle, adam_w, spinnerin, tantek and tantek_ joined the channel