dascher, zztr, brennannovak, e2580, donpdonp, tantek, andreypopp, andreypo_, lmorchard, catsup, friedcell, wajiii, morrocco_mole, mxuribe, aaronpk, tommorris and jancborchardt joined the channel
#tantekover in #whatwg MikeSmith was jokingly asking for the ability to "Like" test cases in order to encourage more of them being written / posted
aaronpk joined the channel
#tantekat first I suggested he build that as an angel funded startup pitched as "a social network for enterprise certification"
#tantekhowever, there might actually be some utility in considering "test case" as a content posting type for indieweb purposes
#tantekI often post one-off test cases that I need in the course of developing various standards, and don't want to bother with figuring out if they belong in a test suite, or which existing test suite etc.
#tantekthe thing about test cases is that they often require their own dedicated URL
#tantekespecially if they test things in <html> <head> <meta> etc.
#tantekso a post "containing" a test case would likely only be an approximation of the test, or test more than it intended
#tanteka post of a test case would necessarily be just a summary
#tantekand it would need a URL to the test case itself
#tantekperhaps we can experiment with test case posts as just being "link" posts tagged with "testcase" and see if there is anything necessary beyond that.
brennannovak joined the channel
#tantekfor reference, the CSSWG test page template has information like: author(s) of test, reviewer(s) of test, link(s) to tested assertion(s), test assertion(s) text(s), requirement flags (tags from a taxonomy) - http://wiki.csswg.org/test/format