#tommorrisWikipedia switched over to protocol-relative URLs a while back when they rolled out HTTPS support.
#tommorrisvery useful if you have the same resources available on both HTTP and HTTPS. something like a CSS stylesheet: <link href="//en.wikipedia.org/.../whatever.css" rel="stylesheet" />
#tommorriswill then load using whatever the protocol the HTML document was retrieved with.
#tantektommorris, what does protocol relative support mean for the relmeauth / indieauth use case however?
#tantekok, theoretical publishing platform. when someone shows an example of this perhaps we can fix it (whereever makes sense)
#tantekperonally I think protocol relative URLs to providers is a *bad idea* and instead you should be explicit about the https when you know they support it.
#tommorrisI think generally, Postel's law should probably apply here. ;-)
#tantekI don't think so. This is security related and thus the sooner an error helps you find a problem in your set-up, the better.
#tommorriswell, I know part of the reason we have it at wikipedia is if you login to, say, wikipedia, a cookie is set for letting you login to all the other sister sites
#tantekbut that's different, the TLD is still the same