voxpelli!tell rhiaro Edingburg HWC switching to tuesdays? Malmö is looking at a non-wednesday date as well due to our venue – would be nice to pick same day
Loqirhiaro: voxpelli left you a message 1 minute ago: Edingburg HWC switching to tuesdays? Malmö is looking at a non-wednesday date as well due to our venue – would be nice to pick same day http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2015-09-28/line/1443429374270
voxpelli!tell tbrb Edingburg HWC switching to tuesdays? Malmö is looking at a non-wednesday date as well due to our venue – would be nice to pick same day
Loqitbrb: voxpelli left you a message 2 hours, 1 minute ago: Edingburg HWC switching to tuesdays? Malmö is looking at a non-wednesday date as well due to our venue – would be nice to pick same day http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2015-09-28/line/1443429470180
KongalooshI heard that Alistar was willing to offer up some space in the SkyScanner offices. This way we'd be in a more public location. Also, it's central.
tantek.comedited /SleekXMPP (+125) "presumably relevance of this project is that you can run it on your indie web site, noting no known indieweb examples yet" (view diff)
snarfed, cleverdevil and cleverdevil- joined the channel
tantek!tell tbrb when you have this week's HWC Edi confirmed (one way or another) could you update https://indiewebcamp.com/Events#Upcoming and the event page week's HWC Edi accordingly? Thanks!
snarfedbear: re gtalk and xmpp federation, you're right about that encryption gotcha, but federation does still work with servers that don't require that (even though i know the recent spec says it's required)
tantekkylewm: sounds like my understanding of XMPP is too poor to capture the indiewebness of it - could you fix my inaccuracies here? https://indiewebcamp.com/SleekXMPP
davidmeadHmm. I think the issues started Saturday. I posted (in quick succesion) about 8 photos from a conference on Instagram. Only 4 made it to my blog…
davidmeadthe privacy settings seem to be all over the place with the silos - Flickr does a good job I think, Twitter tells you no-retweeting a private account
Loqibusiness models are ways to offer indieweb products and or services that users pay for both for their own benefit, and in support an open indie web https://indiewebcamp.com/business-models
kylewmonce it becomes a business, money is a centralizing force, look at the successful podcast networks ... they started out as a couple people in a basement recording, and grew and acquired other podcasts, took over distribution of their t-shirts and marketing and selling advertising for them, until there are only a few big networks making money
tantekkylewm: I think it's more likely there are some (most?) businesses that benefit from economies of scale (a weaker assertion of centralization), however that does not imply that all businesses do so.
@benwerdOnce upon a time, years and years ago, I used to believe you founded startups to build what you wanted to see in the world. I no longer do. (twitter.com/_/status/648580492019658753)
tantekaaronpk: there is no one "the" startup model. I've done one without venture funding, one with. Guess which one had a better (more profitable for the founders) exit?
@benwerdSome startups capture value by providing access to a market or demographic via advertising. I think direct revenue is a more ethical route. (twitter.com/_/status/648581831210614784)
aaronpkI've been listening to the Startup podcast, and they do a good job of illustrating the problems/challenges with the venture-backed startup model
Loqitantek meant to say: benwerd, OTOH, "was going to be just a note but then I kept going" seems like a reasonable Known feature request for status update UX ;)
@benwerdOnce upon a time, years and years ago, I used to believe you founded startups to build what you wanted to see in the world. I no longer do. (twitter.com/_/status/648580492019658753)
benwerdIt's been simmering for a while. I also completely agree with what aaronpk said before I joined the room, about venture funding not (thankfully) being the only route
benwerdThe big big big elephant in the room is that the two "free"s in open source - beer and speech - have been conflated, and we're finding that people are seeking open solutions out because of the price point
tantekI think it's quite reasonable to start something as a hobbie (zero expected revenue), maybe transition (even just a part of) it to "speculative revenue source" where you expect some revenue but not enough to offset costs.
tantekAnd then if by some matter of luck or circumstance revenue or demand picks up faster than expected, it might be reasonable to transition (even just a part of) it to a "startup" where you're committing to a path to profitability.
tantekor put in "negative reasoning", without a path to profitability, a startup is a speculative revenue source at best, and more likely just a hobbie.
tantekto me the very framing "startup" implies you are starting something that is going to up, up in revenue, enough to offset costs = path to profitability
Loqitantek meant to say: to me the very framing "startup" implies you are starting something that is going to go up, up in revenue, enough to offset costs = path to profitability
tantekthat being said, there are certainly lots of hobbie projects and speculative revenue sources that are receiving VC funding for who knows what reasons
tantekpay what you will is [[business-model]] based on a donation button or other [[UX]] that allows and encourages the user of a service to pay what they think the service is worth as a donation.
tantekthe instructions for creating barcamps were published freely, and transferred power from a (smaller) handful of professional conference organizers to a much larger handful of independent conference organizers.
tantekHowever I do struggle with figuring out what/when to attempt to charge for some creative output (e.g. writing, like a book, or speaking like at a conference) vs. blogging/speaking freely, or what mix / transition of the two.
benwerdtantek: There are definitely huge, stonking exceptions. My entire rant is really inspired by a surprising number of people who want us to live in a post-capitalist society - which I'm theoretically on board with, but not at the expense of taking care of practical realities
tantekor if you wish, you may respond to their criticisms with questions asking them what are they doing (creating, building) towards their desired post-capitalist society?
tantekor if they continue criticizing without creating/building, then you may de-prioritize them, knowing that they are unlikely to have an impact by criticism alone