tanteka pop-up is a one-time event, like a one-time Homebrew Website Club at a new city or location, often to see how much interest there is before committing to a regular event.
[sebsel]a pop-up is a one-time event, like a one-time Homebrew Website Club at a new city or location, often to see how much interest there is before committing to a regular event.
bignoseit's quite human and understandable. even being *better* (in features) than Twitter is not enough, because the motivation to stay is largely the fact that one's social network is on Twitter.
KartikPrabhubignose: yes, a very valid point. having your social circle onTwitter is one of the major hindrances. But "more features" is not the excuse
bignoseright. the difficult thing is that people *believe* it's the features which keep them there; so, when someone presents an alternative and they don't want to move, they look for a justification for their feeling
KartikPrabhuto be honest, I have failed at this, since convincing any one person seems to be futile since they can bring up the whole "social circle" argument again
bignoseI think the major advantage is already being pressed hard: IndieWeb is a way to keep control over one's data and publishing, without first requiring everyone else to move there too.
bignoseI think at this stage we need to focus conversation with those who are already dissatisfied, who have already got their own motivation to want to put in some effort to find something other than the big platforms.
bignosepeople who might consider departing Facebook to move to some new proprietary silo from Silicon Valley, is I think a prime recipient for the IndieWeb message.
tantekKartikPrabhu: no indieweb is not at that point because of what I exclaimed earlier in the past few days - how few of the people even here in this channel actually use their own site instead of (before) posting to Twitter
tantekKartikPrabhu: possibly some of them. but I think you'll find a spot check of /IRC_People to be posting natively on Twitter and not their own sites
KartikPrabhubear: yes! most people want a connection between reading and writing. You read something and then by clicking a button share/like/repost something
LoqiA reader (or indie reader) in the context of the indieweb is the portion/feature integrated into an indieweb site that provides a way to read content from other indieweb sites, possibly including posts from the current site as well https://indieweb.org/reader
tantekKartikPrabhu: you can't determine a temporal expression ("caught on") with a static snapshot of a single point in time. you have to look at change over time
Loqi2017-01-01-commitments are implementation and launch commitments publicly made by the IndieWeb community to ship on their personal sites by 2017-01-01 00:00 local time https://indieweb.org/2017-01-01
KartikPrabhuI am dagerously close to the mass adoption anti-pattern because that seems to be why most of the people I interact with don't care about having their own sites
KartikPrabhuI am content with me being the only one, but if the goal of Indieweb is to reach out to more people then it does need to address these "mass adoption" questions
tantekbecause every actual example of mass adoption of social networks never had to bother with "address these ... questions" at any one point in time.
bignosebut note that the people who *did* switch to it were highly unusual, not representative of the people who joined and stayed when it became obvious.
bignoseinstead, look to the people that have *convinced themselves*, before you even got to them, that something else is needed. they need only to know what else is out there.
tantekinstead, have a good solution first, then when people convince themselves they want something, you can point them at the good solution, and say hey, here's the thing you want
tanteksounds like you found an interesting meta problem then, intersecting personal social (actual IRL) networks with onramping/educating/adopting things
tantekthe more generations you try to jump, the lower the probabilitiy of understanding their actual (not asserted) needs/wants, and lower chance of success
tantekKartikPrabhu: worth documenting real world experiences yes. not worth brainstorming theoretical resistances, because they're likely nearly all wrong (as illustrated in the above conversation with just Twitter as an example debunking most assertions of "needs" in an alternative)
tantekKartikPrabhu: I'd say chat with benwerd about it - he has a bunch of experience here with Known, and may be able to help with some guidance about how to document such challenges
Loqicreate in the context of the indieweb refers to the act of and UI for creating a new post, in its simplest form, a new note https://indieweb.org/create
tantekalso a great example why the folks saying "let's just go back to blogs and RSS" are pretty much completely missing the point of what has happened in the past 10+ years
KartikPrabhuno! I think I brought this up a long time ago; one of my friends said [paraphrsing] "so to comment on your blog post, I have to go to my own website, post a comment, and send you a webmention"
tantekKartikPrabhu no re [paraphrasing]. 1. you're already on your own website because that's where you read my blog post because you have an integrated reader. 2. you post a comment right there inline. 3. your server sends the webmention automatically, there is nothing you have to do in the UI.
[sebsel]but yeah, I tried switching to the Indieweb last year around this time. For me, it was Quill that made me want to have a working Micropub endpoint.
tantekkevinmarks, sounds like you need to "own your subscriptions" perhaps by including your blog roll on your personal site, and then patch Woodwind to use it, perhaps even update it via micropub ;)
tantek(unless you're ok with just a stream style see what's latest experience, and in that case, owning your subscriptions (and having woodwind read / write them) is good enough)
davidmeadtantek - i’m finding the indieweb WP plugins don’t always play nice with each other. Missed posts, or posts are created but without “e-content” etc.
tantekdavidmead well you're in the right place. Probably would be helpful to even document which set of plugins you're using and what problems you've run into
tantekyou're likely using your own unique combination that may be surfacing some bugs that various plugin developers (like GWG or pfefferle who hang out here) may not have seen, and could likely fix so that the next person doesn't run into them