[jgmac1106]This one is promising: https://ies.ed.gov/funding/pdf/2018_84305A.pdf If you go to page 32 and look at reading and writing. I would think an exploratory grant around improving reading and writing outcomes using IndieWeb philosophies has potential: $1,400,000
ZegnatOnline reading is such an interesting subject. It always amazes me how the current digital generation seems to be so bad at finding things to read online and checking sources of things.
[jgmac1106]That was my dissertation, we built a fake facebook and then asked kids to answer questions like , "Can a chihuahua dog cure asthma." My actual work focused on the American Revolution and having students try to evaluate research sources and trying to determine what variables best explained the most variance in measures of online research skills
[jgmac1106]That is one of the scary trends with the rise of silos the skills of students have not improved and I am doing some work to show they are actually decreasing (though think it is more of an artifact of more users, thus a greater range of skills as well)
ZegnatI wonder if these skills will adapt again, now that more teenagers are leaving Facebook and will actually have to learn to use “the real internet” again
[jgmac1106]@zegnat wondering if post kinds can be an assistive tool, what if students were encouraged to write a source evaluation post and send webmentions to their peers for example
[jgmac1106]Basically performance in online reading, like all reading is first determined by prior knowledge, yet there are strange ineractions in the models around prior knowledge, and nobody has evaluation skills
[jgmac1106]-----oooh that is cool, wonder what a built in indieweb reader like solution would look like. May have just found a thread for grant narrative thanks folks
Zegnat[jgmac1106], it is slightly more fact-check-based than I recalled. So the markup Google talks about might be too specific for your students. But it is definitely some prior art to look at!
[jgmac1106]@zegnat yes I am thinking a specific post kind called "fact check" or "source verify" I have this idea of creating a simulated environment where students come across bias read alouds (Avatars with opinions)
[jgmac1106]lazyweb sounds derogatory. I think social search is simply more efficient, yet it also means building communities makes one a better reader, and you build communities by reading more
[jgmac1106]going to try and draft a bit of the letter of intent, most IES grants you get dinged on first submission and reapply the next year, but a 3-4 million dollars for building IndieWeb stuff wouldn't be bad
[jgmac1106]so Matthew Effect in regular reading is the more words you know the more you read and the more you read the more words you know. Creates a ceiling for many
[jgmac1106][jeremycherfas] we apply to knowledge as well (words often being proxy measure) The more you know the more you read. The more you read the more you know. Stanovich adopted if from the original sociology construct