[tantek]Has anyone here read "Metaphors We Live By"? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34459.Metaphors_We_Live_By Wondering if it's worth the time to read, would be helpful (or otherwise necessary) before/while writing my blog post(s) critiquing default societal violent/military metaphors. I figure perhaps [chrisaldrich] has or maybe [jgmac1106]. How much do folks cite *books* in their blog posts? (Or think differently of blog posts that do?) Curious
[jgmac1106]In a weird way I kinda delineate "articles" and "posts" based on my formal citations...which usually coincides with a piece being too long to read
petermolnarrecommendation for those who are either starting to build sites now: don't change your permalinks. Have something that always, without exceptions, point to the very same resource forever. Because my site was very differen 10, let alone 20 years ago, and because I failed to follow this example, my rewrite rules are currently at the number of 3093 regexes.
petermolnarin '99 I had a frame based website. I moved on to using PHP as server side templating in around 2004, at which point my urls became ?m=topic&s=subtopic etc.
petermolnarThen rewrite rules emerged, and with that, WordPress appeared, which had the "/category/" for categories (although WP did always had the ?p=[entry ID], and that could be considered as the source-of-truth post URL for WP sites).
petermolnar Somewhere along the years WP introduced custom taxonomy and custom post types, so I got rid of the '/taxonomy/' prefixes. When I dropped WP I made the mistake of going back to '/taxonomy/' for categories, but '/post-name/' for posts.
petermolnarNow I have settled with the exact same setup as my filesystem/folder layout, but in order to have a site that works completely offline, without a webserver, with relative URLs, I have to add filenames to the URIs, eg. /index.html.
[jgmac1106]petermolnar I failed at writing the rewrite rules, why I never migrated my old WP site, I could never get the redirects to work the way I wanted
harmetic, [schmarty], [KevinMarks], [LewisCowles] and plutes joined the channel
[KevinMarks]Lakoff is worth reading, though his later stuff is less illuminating as it has a bit too much "aren't these people I disagree with dumb" in it compared to the empathic earlier stuff
jmacdg: It's also funny how the footnotes themselves are outdated, particularly "hall of flame", which absent knowledge of late-20th-century Usenet-derived slang, sounds... cool.
jackyso aaronpk, you ever considered 'relays' for Webmentions? Like allowing people to use webmention.io as a "bastion" for Webmention and having it resend them to another endpoint?
jackyI'm doing this for lighthouse because I didn't want to have custom logic for taking in webmentions but I _do_ want it to be somewhere and let my in-house one be simply removing and deleting
Loqi[Manny] This book is very frequently quoted by linguists - I just looked it up on Google Scholar, and found a staggering 13517 citations. Nearly everyone has at least glanced through it, and the ideas have permeated the field.
There was a nice Lakoff-relat...
[tantek], [Paulo_Pinto] and wolftune joined the channel