#indieweb 2020-06-12

2020-06-12 UTC
[schmarty], gRegorLove, zootella, wolftune, mattl, jimpick, emilbayes, myfreeweb, [LewisCowles], KartikPrabhu, plutes, gRegorLove_, dckc, cweiske and markopasha joined the channel
#
Loqi
[indienews] New post: "Never nothing to see. Algorithmic feeds or an inbox?" https://prtksxna.com/never-nothing-to-see-algorithmic-feeds-or-an-inbox/
markopasha, wombelix, swentel, KartikPrabhu, neceve_, harmetic and jeremych_ joined the channel
#
jeremycherfas
Good morning IndieWeb
#
petermolnar
good morning
#
petermolnar
Loqi tell me something happy
#
Loqi
guten morgen
#
jeremycherfas
It is Friday; the sun is shining; I hope you are healthy.
[tantek] joined the channel
#
[tantek]
Has anyone here read "Metaphors We Live By"? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34459.Metaphors_We_Live_By Wondering if it's worth the time to read, would be helpful (or otherwise necessary) before/while writing my blog post(s) critiquing default societal violent/military metaphors. I figure perhaps [chrisaldrich] has or maybe [jgmac1106]. How much do folks cite *books* in their blog posts? (Or think differently of blog posts that do?) Curious
#
[tantek]
about people’s experiences.
#
petermolnar
jeremych: fair point :) sun isn't shining, but it's not too bad either.
#
jeremycherfas
petermolnar++ for optimism
#
Loqi
petermolnar has 5 karma in this channel over the last year (22 in all channels)
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106]
[tantek] I link to sources more than cite them in blog posts
#
[jgmac1106]
In a weird way I kinda delineate "articles" and "posts" based on my formal citations...which usually coincides with a piece being too long to read
#
[jgmac1106]
I will have to go with "sun will shine" too early for Sol to cut through the haze of morning fog
#
[LewisCowles]
are you allowed to do that?
anotheryou_, tinfoil-hat, opal, [pfefferle], KartikPrabhu and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
#
petermolnar
recommendation for those who are either starting to build sites now: don't change your permalinks. Have something that always, without exceptions, point to the very same resource forever. Because my site was very differen 10, let alone 20 years ago, and because I failed to follow this example, my rewrite rules are currently at the number of 3093 regexes.
#
petermolnar
*~~either~~
#
petermolnar
I could reduce it by smarter approaches, but at least this way the rules are fairly simple and the algorithm is fairly robust.
#
petermolnar
(yes, this is partially -dev topic)
#
dg
I particularly like it needs a footnote now to explain the usage of "cool"
#
petermolnar
yes, I'm aware of this phrase, but whoever wrote it in '98 doesn't seem to have translated it into Hungarian at that time :P
#
petermolnar
in '99 I had a frame based website. I moved on to using PHP as server side templating in around 2004, at which point my urls became ?m=topic&s=subtopic etc.
#
petermolnar
Then rewrite rules emerged, and with that, WordPress appeared, which had the "/category/" for categories (although WP did always had the ?p=[entry ID], and that could be considered as the source-of-truth post URL for WP sites).
#
petermolnar
Somewhere along the years WP introduced custom taxonomy and custom post types, so I got rid of the '/taxonomy/' prefixes. When I dropped WP I made the mistake of going back to '/taxonomy/' for categories, but '/post-name/' for posts.
#
petermolnar
Now I have settled with the exact same setup as my filesystem/folder layout, but in order to have a site that works completely offline, without a webserver, with relative URLs, I have to add filenames to the URIs, eg. /index.html.
#
petermolnar
hence the monsterous rewrite ruleset I have.
tinfoil-hat, KempfCreative and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106]
petermolnar I failed at writing the rewrite rules, why I never migrated my old WP site, I could never get the redirects to work the way I wanted
harmetic, [schmarty], [KevinMarks], [LewisCowles] and plutes joined the channel
#
[KevinMarks]
Lakoff is worth reading, though his later stuff is less illuminating as it has a bit too much "aren't these people I disagree with dumb" in it compared to the empathic earlier stuff
swentel, dckc, KapiX, a_chou and wolftune joined the channel
#
jmac
dg: It's also funny how the footnotes themselves are outdated, particularly "hall of flame", which absent knowledge of late-20th-century Usenet-derived slang, sounds... cool.
mauz555 and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106]
and Simpsons fans with the "L Dog /D Man Flame Wars"
nickodd, [tantek], [chrisaldrich] and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
[KevinMarks]
Here's me trying to talk to lakoff about open source frames in 2007 https://youtu.be/jNLP88aTg_8?t=2700
gRegorLove and samclarke[m] joined the channel
#
jacky
I don't think this is a dev-y question; more of a feature discussion thing
#
jacky
so aaronpk, you ever considered 'relays' for Webmentions? Like allowing people to use webmention.io as a "bastion" for Webmention and having it resend them to another endpoint?
#
jacky
I'm doing this for lighthouse because I didn't want to have custom logic for taking in webmentions but I _do_ want it to be somewhere and let my in-house one be simply removing and deleting
#
jacky
(since the only way to delete via webmention is via 410s and I wouldn't want to fake a call to do that)
#
aaronpk
it does that!
#
aaronpk
kinda devvy, but you can set up webmention.io to forward your webmentions to a webhook
#
jacky
oh TIL
#
jacky
lol hmm
#
aaronpk
that's how my site gets webmentions
#
jacky
hmm I don't see that in the docs (from a `ctrl+f`)
#
aaronpk
the docs are...not great
#
jacky
noted! I'm trying to use my homepage for that (in a intro-y way)
#
jacky
have a section for each feature and then (ideally) link to a docs site
#
[KevinMarks]
Mention.tech does pass through too. So you can potentially ask it for webmentions before you had your own endpoint
#
jacky
there's no mention of that on the site (and nothing in the README) for mention.tech
#
[KevinMarks]
Yeah, I need to do docs. The site is ugly too.
#
[KevinMarks]
I built it as a protocol test, it needs some polish to be a usable tool.
#
aaronpk
like indieauth.com, I am hesitant to put more work into webmention.io because it's running some pretty legacy tech right now
#
aaronpk
i'm just glad to see more user-friendly tools like pine.blog for handling webmentions :)
#
jacky
I've seen that name before
#
aaronpk
definitely check it out
twomanytacos joined the channel
#
sknebel
What is pine.blog?
#
Loqi
Pine.blog is a reader and blog hosting service that supports Webmention https://indieweb.org/Pine.blog
KapiX joined the channel
#
jacky
oh wow you can follow YouTube channels from pine.blog's mobile app
#
jacky
tbh I only want the reader lol
#
[schmarty]
i follow a few youtube channels in aperture/monocle!
#
[schmarty]
(using the youtube-still-provides-these-wow channel RSS feeds)
wolftune joined the channel
#
jacky
oh poo pine.blog doesn't have micropub support
#
jacky
now everyone knows my user name is an anime character's nickname lol
#
jacky
oh that's not aaron's site; that's his _youtube_ channel
#
jacky
multiple timelines is a paid feature? hmm
#
jacky
tbh I'd be okay with like 3 free ones and then charging beyond that
[snarfed], wolftune, GWG and [LewisCowles] joined the channel
#
[LewisCowles]
internet archive I've just read is closing it's book / library feature... 😿
ben_thatmustbeme, KartikPrabhu and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
[KevinMarks]
I thought it was reverting to the previous version where one person can borrow at a time
#
sknebel
yes, they're just ending the covid special program with less restrictions early
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel; nickodd left the channel
#
[chrisaldrich]
tantek, I haven't read that particular Lakoff book, but it's on my shelf. I suspect it's right up your alley for that post (epigraph) you're writing. I've got it on my to read list, in part, via this review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44610381?book_show_action=false
#
Loqi
[Manny] This book is very frequently quoted by linguists - I just looked it up on Google Scholar, and found a staggering 13517 citations. Nearly everyone has at least glanced through it, and the ideas have permeated the field. There was a nice Lakoff-relat...
[tantek], [Paulo_Pinto] and wolftune joined the channel
#
[chrisaldrich]
tantek, incidentally I recall that particular book being based heavily on a shorter journal article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2025464?seq=1 which my unpaywall browser extension (https://unpaywall.org/) indicates has an open access pdf copy here: https://escholarship.org/content/qt2p93q7nr/qt2p93q7nr.pdf?t=nvwddy
[snarfed], [schmarty], seekr and wolftune joined the channel