#[Murray]^ good post. I'd never really considered adding microformats to my media reviews, mainly because I'd never seen a purpose for them. But it would be interesting to surface what other people are watching/enjoying in a social-reader-like context (not that I use one of those, either 😅)
shadowkyogre, gRegor and bterry joined the channel; shadowkyogre left the channel
#[tantek]"never seen a purpose for them" exactly, without a clear consuming code use-case that someone shows interest in building, there's no point to additional markup. We have enough publishing examples now that someone *could* build a consuming code use-case if they wanted with those examples in the wild.
#[aciccarello]Reviews are tough because they have so much economic power there's incentives to be deceitful. But I could see someone building a tool to view reviews from people you trust (as opposed to an aggregate "people on amazon").
ShockTohp and timdream joined the channel
#[tantek]yeah, this is one of the reasons I grew skeptical of the review-aggregate summary publishing/format and stopped working on it
#[tantek]more on that in #indieweb-dev or #microformats if we want to talk about specs
win0err, bterry, asarandi, [jacky], cimento and mlncn joined the channel
#[Murray]but [tantek], that's kind of the point of the post. there's currently no point in me adding additional machine context to my reviews because there are no such services, but if there were I would do so, as I quite like that idea. Dunno, always seems like a catch-22
#[aciccarello]The use case I'm thinking of would be "what X do people I follow recommend?" Which would require a search service based on a set of websites.
#[Murray]yeah that's exactly what I was thinking above, I could see that being baked into a social reader or some other place that knows a "follow list" or sorts. would be kinda fun
#[aciccarello]It's kinda similar to recipes in that it's less time dependent. Usually I only care about the last few posts from a blog or other feed. But reviews and recipes last longer and so you could end up with a large library of reviews or recommendations that an application would search.
#[aciccarello]Benji made some interesting points on Wednesday about his ratings of movies changing over time. He was asking about combined review/watch posts since he rates movies each time he watches them.
#[Murray]that's how I do it to. Each entry gets a new review any time I watch it, often with a slightly different rating. The rating shown at the top is the aggregate of those below
#[Murray]and interesting that it's less time dependent for you; I think it would be the inverse for me, to some extent 😅 like, if lots of people are talking about a new show or something _now_ then I'd be more interested then seeing it in a month or so 🤷
#Loqi[preview] [benji] I brought it up again at HWC Pacific since its one of the main ways I use my site and the lack of consensus has always bothered me.
I create watch posts with sparkles where the u-watch-of property is an h-cite with name, year, IMDB ID, and IMDB URL. ...
#[aciccarello]I don't have reviews right now but my recipes all appear in my main feed when I post them. So I wouldn't consider time irrelevant but less relevant.