2017-01-25 UTC
snarfed joined the channel
snarfed and tantek joined the channel
# 20:04 tantek is this strictly for development discussion, or would usability issues be fair game as well?
# 20:05 tantek snarfed, you may want to review #indieweb since like literally when you departed ;)
# 20:05 snarfed i've only skimmed the discussion, but i haven't seen concrete suggestions yet
# 20:05 tantek I think we're still trying to uncover the issues
# 20:05 snarfed i wonder if some of it is that bridgy is ready for generations 1 and 2, but he's hoping it's ready for 3 and 4
# 20:05 tantek specifically the usability of WordPress with Bridgy (using various plugins that try to do it for you)
# 20:06 tantek snarfed: except he's a developer (programmer)
# 20:06 snarfed i was reacting to 'I can say, with no reservation, that the Bridgy web site would make no sense to a "mortal"'
# 20:08 tantek yeah. and I'm not sure that's bad? (re: mortal) given wanting to grow bridgy usage slowly, or concerns about silo shutdowns
# 20:09 snarfed but i'm not entirely ready to do a deep dive into heavily redesiging/polishing the product and UX part
# 20:09 snarfed (lacking both interest and ability, to some degree :P)
# 20:11 tantek snarfed, if we can capture the confusion / issues / questions, I'm willing to help with copy-editing docs (pull requests on github)
# 20:12 tantek that's probably where I can do the most good in terms of Bridgy contributions
# 20:12 snarfed honestly though i do think it's pretty polished for gen 1 and 2 as is, though, and addressing 3 and cdevroe might need a bigger overhaul, not just more docs'
# 20:13 tantek sure that's possible. I may be able to get somewhere with simplifying docs though. sometimes copy / format editing can make a difference