#dev 2017-01-23

2017-01-23 UTC
#
miklb GWG do you know of anyone using the templates as they are? Would love to see an example
#
aaronparecki.com edited /recipe (+190) "update my recipes!" (view diff)
#
GWG miklb: No one. That is why I thought I was safe to enhance the features
KevinMarks and tantek joined the channel
#
KartikPrabhu tantek: your instagram link to the photo in http://tantek.com/2017/022/t3/dream-in-rain seems to be broken
#
Loqi [Tantek Çelik] a jpg. #Dream! #nofilter Stopped in the rain to take this photo. Water on the glass unintentionally took a burst of photos and this one happened to be better than the carefully cropped shot I took afterwards. #NYC #Brooklyn #LIC #LongIslandCity #ML... https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/16111071_183305332149338_924432916656685056_n.jpg
#
aaronpk works for me
#
KartikPrabhu weird
#
tantek KartikPrabhu: bad text copy in their UI when you're not logged in and try to view a private post
#
tantek what is a private post
#
Loqi private posts refer to posts or portions of posts which are private to either the author or to a limited audience chosen by the author https://indieweb.org/private_post
#
KartikPrabhu oh! ok got it
#
aaronpk oh ha
#
tantek I'll document
#
aaronpk oh funny, when I visit that link, it actually redirects me to an even longer URL
KevinMarks joined the channel
#
tantek aaronpk: yes I figured out the relevant part of the URL (Same between public/private modes) and my bookmarklet cleans that up
#
aaronpk aha
#
tantek it's like 11 chars or something
#
tantek (of "ID")
#
tantek.com edited /private_posts (+928) "/* Silo Examples */ Instagram, private posts really side-effect of private accounts, confusing error when logged out" (view diff)
#
tantek KartikPrabhu: is this the error message you saw: https://indieweb.org/private_posts#Instagram
#
KartikPrabhu yup
#
aaronpk this paprika app is really good
KevinMarks joined the channel
#
aaronpk it doesn't force you to enter things in specific fields, and does a good job of figuring out what you mean
#
aaronpk you just type "1/2 cup lentils" and then when you scale the recipe up it knows how to multiply it
#
aaronpk pretty much everything is stored as freeform text, just in a couple of text boxes for the different hRecipe properties
KevinMarks, tantek and miklb joined the channel
#
miklb aaronpk the parsing engine to grab recipes off a web page is pretty good in Paprika too.
#
KartikPrabhu what is paprika?
#
Loqi Paprika is an application (MacOSX) for creating an organizing recipes for making food https://indieweb.org/Paprika
#
aaronparecki.com uploaded /Special:Log/upload "uploaded "[[File:paprika-recipe-ui.png]]""
#
miklb.com edited /Paprika (+8) (view diff)
#
aaronparecki.com edited /Paprika (+43) "use uploaded screenshot, mention importing" (view diff)
#
aaronpk it parses hRecipe too!
#
aaronparecki.com edited /recipe (+14) "/* See Also */" (view diff)
#
aaronpk what is hRecipe
#
Loqi It looks like we don't have a page for "hRecipe" yet. Would you like to create it?
#
aaronpk hRecipe is a Microformats 1 vocabulary for marking up [[recipes]].
#
loqi.me created /hRecipe (+98) "prompted by aaronpk and dfn added by aaronpk" (view diff)
#
Loqi ok
#
aaronparecki.com edited /recipe (+47) "/* Aaron Parecki */" (view diff)
#
aaronparecki.com edited /events/2017-01-25-homebrew-website-club (+62) "/* Portland */" (view diff)
KevinMarks and mblaney joined the channel
#
bear .
KevinMarks_, KevinMarks, tantek and cweiske joined the channel
#
KartikPrabhu should p-* properties not have any unicode characters?
#
Zegnat HTML5 classes can contain full unicode, I believe, so theoretically you could use them. Not sure about portability for that though.
#
KartikPrabhu yeah not worried about HTML but about microformats consumers
arush joined the channel
#
voxpelli microformat-node can at least parse p-* properties with åäö as well as emojis in it
tantek joined the channel
#
Zegnat voxpelli, you have done p-??
#
voxpelli for testing purposes purely ?
#
Zegnat of course
#
tantek hmm - I think we have an issue on limiting chars for mf class names, because of avoiding collisions with various other frameworks and stuff
#
tantek ah yes: "The "*" for root (and property) class names consists only of lowercase a-z and '-' characters. " bottom of http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2-parsing#parse_an_element_for_class_microformats
#
Loqi [Tantek Çelik] microformats2 parsing specification
#
voxpelli tantek: perhaps a test case should be added for that, which ensures that libraries does not accept such names? because people will probably more often do trial and error than read actual docs
#
tantek huh maybe
#
tantek perhaps even for specific cases that caused the issue
#
voxpelli probably more a case of parsers wondering whether they should support it or not, so parsers may accidentally support an unnecessarily wide range of chars
#
Zegnat Is there any documentation on what frameworks were blocking non-a-z chars?
#
tantek Zegnat yes it is in an issue
#
tantek let's see if we can trace it back
#
tantek from http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=microformats2-parsing&action=history we can find "2016-02-29T00:55:19 Tantek (Talk | contribs | block) (15,017 bytes) (→parse an element for class microformats: a-z\- only)"
#
tantek so apparently not, I didn't link to the issue from the change
#
tantek so looking at http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2-parsing-issues instead (since it was an older issue)
#
Loqi microformats2-parsing-issues
#
tantek searching for a-z I found http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2-parsing-issues#ignore_u-camelCase_properties
#
Loqi microformats2-parsing-issues
#
tantek Zegnat, from that fragment link: Suit CSS and more frameworks mentioned in http://davidtheclark.com/on-utility-classes/
#
Zegnat Yeah, was reading
#
tantek test cases to check some of those would be welcome! along with issues filed on parsers that erroneously permit them
#
Zegnat surprises me, for some I reason I thought all unicode characters would have been permitted for property names.
#
tantek Zegnat, nah, it's typical for standards and voculary to limit such things
#
tantek s/voculary/vocabulary
#
@pixelroiber webmentions test, bitte nicht klicken http://pixelroiber.de/blog/16399 (twitter.com/_/status/823545599257673728)
#
aaronpk klicks
#
tantek lol
#
cweiske https://duckduckgo.com/?q=do+not+push+red+button&t=canonical&ia=web
#
loqi.me created /iceberg_post (+177) "prompted by Zegnat and dfn added by sebsel" (view diff)
#
loqi.me edited /iceberg_post (+89) "/* See Also */ new section" (view diff)
#
loqi.me edited /private_posts (+19) "sebsel added "[[iceberg post]]" to "See Also"" (view diff)
#
tantek wat
#
tantek first time I have heard that term in that way! is there an earlier reference in the wild?
#
tantek or did this just get made up?
#
sebsel surry :(
#
sebsel Zegnat made me do it
#
sebsel see #indieweb
#
sebsel I can delete it, no prob
#
tantek no I wasn't asking to delete, just asking to understand
#
tantek there are other posting / writing styles that we don't explicitly document per se, and wondering if this was related
#
tantek e.g. inverted pyramic
#
tantek pyramid*
#
sebsel what's that?
#
aaronpk i like iceberg post! basically partial post privacy right?
#
sebsel it's just another name for it
#
sebsel yeah so it's not really a writing style like inverted pyramid, but an actual way of presenting a post
#
sebsel that is: only it's public part, and a private part after login
#
tantek aaronpk: the challenge with that specific use for iceberg post is that it's kind of a weird twist on inverted pyramid, and I'm not sure why / how it's different?
#
sebsel (I don't have a way to access the private part at the moment though)
#
tantek similarly, public "summary" in RSS feed, full content in HTML
#
sebsel yeah, but I don't show my text anymore.
#
tantek not having anything to do with private posts, but rather, syndication feed / summary
#
aaronpk iceberg post is nothing to do with a writing style tho
#
sebsel https://seblog.nl/2017/01/16/3/als-ik-in-bed-lig
#
Loqi [Sebastiaan Andeweg] Seb heeft 501 woorden geschreven.
#
tantek similarly for home page *summary* of an article in an h-feed composite stream, vs. full content on article permalink
#
sebsel there is actually text in that post, but I don't publicly show it
#
tantek whether or not you make the permalink private is different from (orthogonal to) whether or not you provide a public summary in a feed or home page
#
aaronpk sebsel: i didn't expect to see the first part of the text you wrote on that link, i thought it was all private?
#
sebsel Oh no that's misleading
#
sebsel That's a webmention :)
#
aaronpk aha
#
sebsel I should get a 'reacties' head there.
#
aaronpk the webmention apparently was received before the post was written ;-)
#
aaronpk 9:36 vs 9:38
#
Loqi yea
#
tantek another similar example is paywall stuff
#
tantek public summary, paywalled full content
#
tantek is that really private if anyone can pay for access to it?
#
tantek what is a paywall
#
Loqi It looks like we don't have a page for "paywall" yet. Would you like to create it?
#
tantek wow thought we had that
#
tantek what is paid content
#
Loqi It looks like we don't have a page for "paid content" yet. Would you like to create it?
#
tantek alright nevermind, for another day
#
tantek what is business models?
#
Loqi business models are ways to offer indieweb products and or services that users pay for both for their own benefit, and in support an open indie web https://indieweb.org/business-models
#
tantek sebsel: do you use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLUF_(communication) in your writing?
#
sebsel aaronpk oops. yeah, that's weird. I actually already knew that my next post would be /3, so I just mentioned it. And I send it again after posting /3. But it's not really correct indeed
#
tantek lol mention before written
#
sebsel tantek I believe I don't. at least not intentionally
#
sebsel I had written the post :) I didn't publish it yet.
#
aaronpk haha k
#
Loqi hehe
#
sebsel better way to do it would indeed be to first post /3 (as /2) and then post the post mentioning it.
#
sebsel yeah I guess the problem with 'iceberg post' is that it's unrelated to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceberg_Theory
#
sebsel what is iceberg post?
#
Loqi iceberg post is a post that has both a public and a private part, thus an example of Partial Page Privacy https://indieweb.org/iceberg_post
#
tantek reads
#
sebsel yeah, Iceberg Theory seems to be a writing style
#
tantek that's a good wikipedia page
#
sebsel just found it after a duckduckgo on 'iceberg writing'. should've done that earlier :)
#
sebsel searching for pictures also reveals a lot of strange metaphores.
#
sebsel but that's offtopic.
#
tantek sebsel - perhaps consider updating /iceberg_post to be more about the writing style since that's prior art
#
tantek maybe keep the new addition as another possible interpretation
#
sebsel But it's not about writing styles! :(
#
tantek what it?
#
tantek it's confusing to have two things meaning iceberg that are very different
#
aaronpk but..
#
aaronpk iceberg
#
aaronpk is already a thing
#
aaronpk that is not writing
#
tantek metaphor
#
tantek rather two iceberg metaphors that mean different things in the same context of writing is confusing
#
aaronpk iceberg post is only related to writing in that it also involves words. it's not *about* writing, or even in the context of writing
#
aaronpk you could have an iceberg post that doesn't even have words!
#
sebsel in a way, my deleted posts are iceberg in that way too: they still have their content, but since I marked them as 'deleted', they only show a tombstone in the feed.
#
sebsel maybe making it worse with this, but that's an example.
#
sebsel I might also fully delete the content from my server, but then they would not be iceberg anymore
#
sebsel and aaronpk's 'no words': it can be a public 'Aaron made a payment' with the actual amount as a private property.
#
sebsel don't know if that's valid.
#
tantek does it need a special term? aren't all these just uses / examples of "summary" vs. "content"?
#
tantek like a summary post?
#
sebsel what is summary post?
#
Loqi It looks like we don't have a page for "summary post" yet. Would you like to create it?
#
sebsel hm
#
tantek what is a summary?
#
Loqi A summary is short text that conveys a post's main point(s), or a plain text equivalent for kinds of posts like likes and RSVPs that use other properties to convey their meaning https://indieweb.org/summary
#
tantek sebsel it sounds like you've identified more use-cases for using "summary" - perhaps add them there?
#
sebsel it might be
#
tantek at least to the Brainstorming section?
#
sebsel So that would make my iceberg post a private post with p-summary
#
tantek because you can have a post with just a "summary" property and no "content"
#
sebsel and I would then choose that all my private posts have a public summary
#
sebsel and no private summary
#
tantek yes that makes sense, unless their very existence is private
#
sebsel then you would not publish a summary.
#
sebsel I actually hide all my private posts from my feed now though.
#
tantek that's different than deleted posts then
#
sebsel what is deleted?
#
Loqi A deleted is a post that has been removed https://indieweb.org/deleted
#
sebsel this suggests the tombstoning: https://indieweb.org/deleted#Tombstoning
#
sebsel But that's a different thing then.
#
tantek.com edited /Planning (+145) "/* NYC */ interested in co-organizing an IWC Brooklyn in particular. cc GWG" (view diff)
#
seblog.nl edited /summary (+273) "/* Brainstorming */ + private posts" (view diff)
#
seblog.nl edited /iceberg_post (+107) "added tanteks criticism" (view diff)
tantek joined the channel
#
loqi.me created /Social_API (+31) "prompted by tantek and dfn added by tantek" (view diff)
#
Zegnat Just reading. But sebsel’s current iceberg post implementation does not in any way remind me of a summary. It sounds like a private post type that you want to give an alternative public representation. But that alternative representation does not necessarily work as a summary of the actual private thing. E.g. he makes a private writing post (maybe
#
Zegnat it’s a chapter of his next book) and he stores that on his server, but obviously does not want to show that. He still wants to have a post in his feed expressing he did some writing though. So he adds an alternative public part to his private post. He would not post an actual summary of the private thing.
#
tantek Zegnat, that example in particular, chapter of a book, I feel I have seen with actual content in the summary in practice
#
tantek so I'm not sure I agree
#
tantek also from that perspective, the visible tip of the iceberg *is* part of the *actual* iceberg
#
tantek it's not just a "warning about the iceberg"
#
tantek so it really is a summary
#
tantek whereas if you're posting something that has no summary at all, then the term iceberg makes even less sense
#
voxpelli "He still wants to have a post in his feed expressing he did some writing" - well the _activity_ and the _output_ of that activity is two distinctly different things
#
voxpelli So then just make two posts – one representing that an activity happened and then a decoupled other representing the output of said activity
#
voxpelli The summary of a post doesn't represent the activity of creating that post – it represents a summary of the content of that post, which is a distinctly different thing
#
Zegnat voxpelli, that seems to be what he has implemented right now. He wrote a thing using his web engine, and instead of showing the thing he wrote, he showed something that is indicative of the thing (in this case, the amount of words he wrote).
#
aaronpk i experimented with that some last year when i was rebuilding p3k. it didn't make it into the final cut.
#
Zegnat Yes, voxpelli, which is why I was saying this isn’t a summary ;)
#
voxpelli Zegnat: ok, and how does that relate to this "iceberg post" thingie? which sounds like it's just a different word for public page upgrading
#
Zegnat I am looking at what sebsel built: a post type where he writes text, and instead of showing that text, he only publicly shows the word count and the fact he has done writing.
#
Zegnat That is the implementation he called “iceberg post”.
#
Zegnat Maybe the term “iceberg post” is still not right, but I would not call what he implemented a summary.
#
tantek Zegnat, sure, it's more meta, like a diff
#
tantek but certainly not an iceberg in any meaning. maybe a photo of the tip of an iceberg on the horizon :P
#
voxpelli Seems like "iceberg post" is just public page upgrading, and then sebsel has decided he want the summary of a piece of content to be coupled with the activity of creating that content rather than have the two be decoupled from each other
#
tantek sounds like just "activity"
#
tantek in the classic "activity streams" way of thinking
#
voxpelli yeah
#
voxpelli I'm a bit suprised in a way there's no generic way to mark up activities – seems like each activity so far has gotten its own top level h-*
#
voxpelli nope, not top level h-*, but top level p-*
#
aaronpk we haven't really seen examples of publishing activities at all yet. mostly we publish posts/actual content. i think the closest to activites we see are the posts such as "liked this post"
#
voxpelli Something like: <div>Pelle <abbr class="p-activity" title="sell">sold</span> something</div>
#
voxpelli with extra data etc of course
#
tantek what is Firefox Activations
#
Loqi https://indieweb.org/Firefox_Activations
#
tantek voxpelli: there's no generic way to markup activities because there's never been good enough use-cases documented for actually bothering to *consume* and *display* them!
#
tantek and in general, "activity" is an unnecessary level of "meta"
#
tantek x posted y
#
tantek is meta
#
tantek instead of just author:x, post-content:y
#
tantek similar with likes, etc.
#
tantek this was a long big debate back in the early days of AS2 at W3C
#
tantek and we pretty much proved all the "real" use-cases that the AS folks could come up with could be massively simplified by dropping the unnecessary "activity" abstraction
#
voxpelli tantek: that can totally be true, but rather than risking having all such activities as "p-<verb>" I would much rather have any such experimentations as "p-activity=<verb>" or similar :)
#
tantek when we researched real world examples of these "activities", in enough cases they themselves had permalinks so we didn't need the meta activity post
#
tantek so we have a /like post, not a /like activity
#
tantek etc.
#
tantek for Zegnat :
#
tantek what is Firefox Activations?
#
Loqi https://indieweb.org/Firefox_Activations
#
tantek hmm
#
tantek.com edited /Firefox_Activations (+17) "dfn" (view diff)
#
tantek fixed
#
Zegnat Yes, tantek, I was just looking at the Known code: https://github.com/idno/Known/blob/5593071b3a792709f66cec0e425d70bd666c07c6/IdnoPlugins/Firefox/worker.js
#
voxpelli If I wanted to mark up an h-feed with activities where I have sold things, updated things, wrote things, been lifting some weights, been cooking some food etc and just want to categorize them all like segnat now wanted to express his "write" activity – then it would be good not to create a thousands "u-<activity>-of" properties
#
Zegnat That doesn’t actually seem to implement Micropub in a WebExtension though
#
tantek Zegnat, no, it's a browser extension of a sort
#
voxpelli tantek: have you seen that the Social API seems to be deprecated in the next Firefox version? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1289549
#
tantek that's my point, it's something that works and you can add to your browser
#
tantek hmm
#
tantek voxpelli: that's inaccurate. it's being simplified, not deprecated
#
Zegnat I was mostly focussed on getting an actual MicroPub going in WebExtension. Which would make it compatible with Opera/Chromium/Chrome/Firefox. So I skipped past things like Social API.
#
tantek like dumping the sidebar stuff that the Known add-on doesn't use anyway
#
tantek Zegnat, yes, while WebExtension would be nicer, as you point out, there are currently challenges there to be overcome
#
voxpelli Speaking of sharing stuff through browsers, this looks very similar to webactions: https://twitter.com/Paul_Kinlan/status/823466675718733825
#
@Paul_Kinlan I made a <share-button> web component. + stylable + native share + copy url + configurable share buttons test ? https://output.jsbin.com/lefoqo/3 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C22KKOMW8AAwrki.png (twitter.com/_/status/823466675718733825)
#
tantek while my point is - Known add-on for Social API is a *working* example
#
tantek so you can use that as a starting point and iterate
#
tantek rather than banging your head against WebExtension up front
#
Zegnat The way the Social API works I belief it is impossible to ever make the endpoint configurable, except on installation. Which instantly makes me throw Social API out of the window. WebExtensions I can query for the endpoint to use and everything, only authentication is a not-yet solved issue.
#
tantek interesting criticism
#
tantek could you add that to /Social_API#Issues ?
#
Zegnat Yes, I could. Will be later tonight after I get my dailies done!
#
voxpelli looks at https://indieweb.org/posts and finds some brainstorming around post types like "p-<verb>" and "u-<verb>-of" that could just as well fit into a more generic "p-activity=<verb>" rather than have the activity verb be hidden away like that
#
voxpelli ate, read, workedout
#
Zegnat I actually discussed tracking activities like that with sebsel yesterday over burgers. Though I wasn’t sure what a feed like that would look like yet.
#
voxpelli in a lifestreaming indie-reader all of that info could be neat, but in a Twitter-style indie-reader one would probably want to strip out all such noisy activity-level items and just keep the more substantial items
#
Zegnat Well, that’s again where feed splitting comes in, voxpelli. I.e. offering a feed of only posts. That seems pretty common, even with RSS
#
KevinMarks A post tracking words written is common for professional writers too. Jo Walton and Cory Doctorow both do them
#
voxpelli would also be neat to be able to use new activity types without it having any effect on any readers, like suddenly the lifestreaming noise getting through into Twitter-level indie-readers that haven't yet added support for filtering it out
#
tantek maybe the counterpart of a /read post?
#
tantek voxpelli: the counter-example is also true - of wanting some summary to show up in existing readers without having to update them
#
tantek anybody extract videos from Twitter posts?
#
voxpelli tantek: wanting some summary of what?
#
tantek the post
#
KevinMarks http://papersky.livejournal.com/689842.html
#
Loqi [Jo Walton (http://l-stat.livejournal.net/img/userinfo.gif?v=17080?v=144.4papersky) wrote,] Thud: Poor Relations
#
voxpelli sure, put not a summary of eg. my new cool Runkeeper-inspired elliptical exercise logging that you probably don't care about at all unless you're my training buddy :)
#
aaronpk tantek: XRay parses videos from tweets
#
tantek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3U - great: "There is no formal specification for the M3U format; it is a de facto standard." :(
#
tantek into mp4?!?
#
aaronpk so if I repost a tweet, my post will include the video
#
tantek wat
#
aaronpk yeah twitter includes an mp4 link
#
tantek how did you extract it?
#
tantek hmmm
#
aaronpk there's a handful of formats linked in a tweet, i just pick out the mp4 one
#
voxpelli Zegnat: feed splitting is good, but indie-readers should be able to support filtering as well when giving a full on firehose-style composite stream
#
tantek then I'll just ask, what's the mp4 link for https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/822495850899374080 ?
#
@bubbaprog https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/822495850899374080/video/1 (twitter.com/_/status/822495850899374080)
#
tantek voxpelli, Zegnat given that *any* reader "filtering" is yet to be figured out, I'd say that's designing a bit too a priori to have a chance at getting it right
#
KevinMarks Otoh there is a formal standard for xspf but noöne uses it
#
tantek KevinMarks: because XML--
#
tantek XML_-
#
tantek XML--
#
Loqi xml has -1 karma in this channel (-12 overall)
#
aaronpk https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/822495820096434178/pu/vid/1280x720/pPDZgu29DZLatDea.mp4
#
KevinMarks There are formal standards that use m3u
#
tantek haha just found http://www.downloadtwittervideo.com/
#
tantek a whole site just for this
#
Loqi tantek: lol
#
tantek aaronpk++ thanks!
#
Loqi aaronpk has 28 karma in this channel (1183 overall)
#
aaronpk i don't think i had actually tested reposting a tweet with video yet, so i'm glad that worked :)
#
tantek what is repost with comment
#
Loqi It looks like we don't have a page for "repost with comment" yet. Would you like to create it?
#
tantek hmm
#
tantek what is a quote
#
Loqi A quotation is a type of post that is primarily a subset of the contents of another post, and often has a citation of that other post https://indieweb.org/quote
#
KevinMarks https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-20
#
voxpelli tantek: Zegnat: most large social medias filter different kinds of posts and shows them in different places though, so any reader mimicking them would have to do the same
#
KevinMarks Which cites Wikipedia for m3u
#
tantek sure, but no one has built any non-social-media alternatives to such readers
#
aaronpk woo https://webmention.rocks/test/22
#
Loqi [Webmention Rocks!] Discovery Test #22
#
aaronpk i'm hopefully going to focus on webmention.rocks this week
#
tantek repost with comment is [[quotation#Secondary_brief_commentary]]
#
Loqi ok
#
loqi.me created /repost_with_comment (+49) "prompted by tantek and dfn added by tantek" (view diff)
#
Zegnat I think most readers currently built mirror either Twitter or RSS. So whether someone like Facebook is doing fancy splitting doesn’t really matter as nobody is mimicking them yet ;) voxpelli
#
tantek there, we've had that asked too many times
#
tantek Zegnat, readers that mirror RSS will be deadends that only a few geeks use, the world has moved on
#
Zegnat aaronpk, just seen your new webmention.rocks test come in, nice!
#
voxpelli Zegnat: well, eg. Twitter filters out likes and shows only a couple of them, so there's some filtering already – and just by having the full types of posts of Facebook, and even wider, we're past what Twitter has to deal with. Eg. how would Twitter handle bookmarks? We don't know, because they don't have to deal with it
#
tantek readers that mimick Twitter or FB have a better chance, especially if they're integrated
#
Zegnat Ah, Twitter filters likes? I don’t think they were doing that the 3+ or so years ago I was actually still using Twitter
#
Zegnat uses an RSS reader for every-little-thing
#
voxpelli Zegnat: well, typically Twitter has never shown you the likes of others unless you used eg. Tweetdeck or some other client. Only recently has they started showing you some few selected likes in your feed every now and then
#
Zegnat Interesting. Good to know!
#
voxpelli Twitter also supports turning off retweets from any user that one follows
#
Zegnat Now I should really get to doing to hashtag-100-days-of’s. Will be back later :)
#
tantek.com edited /quotation (+371) "Quote entirety with commentary, specifically, POSSE tweet implications, quoted tweet" (view diff)
#
tantek I'm interested in understanding this more: https://indieweb.org/quotation#Quote_entirety_with_commentary
#
tantek just wrote down some thoughts for now
#
tantek considering implementing it for things like reposting someone's photo or video but adding my own commentary
#
tantek I find it interesting that Twitter calls it "quoted tweet" rather than "retweet with comment" for example
#
tantek that makes me think that thinking of those as "quotation" posts rather than "reposts" makes sense
#
loqi.me created /lifestreaming (+119) "prompted by voxpelli and dfn added by voxpelli" (view diff)
#
voxpelli the overlap of bookmark, repost and quotation is interesting
#
tantek voxpelli: it's taken a lot of real world examples to attempt to sort those out
#
voxpelli all three could make sense for eg. shared links like https://voxpelli.com/links/
#
tantek it's nearly a useless conversation without real world examples
#
tantek because people can argue things so many ways theoretically
#
tantek does anyone POSSE quotations as quoted tweets?
#
tantek does anyone know if Bridgy Publish supports POSSEing a quotation post of a tweet to Twitter as a quoted tweet?
#
voxpelli (one could btw POSSE any quotation nowadays by using the feature that allows a text-representation of an uploaded image –> generate image of quote + add quote as text-representation)
#
voxpelli on Twitter that is
#
tantek that's probably worth adding to /quotation#Brainstorming
#
tantek hmm I found https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/504
#
tantek.com edited /quote_tweet (+8) "see also quotation" (view diff)
#
tantek.com edited /quotation (+18) "/* Quote entirety with commentary */ linky quote tweet" (view diff)
#
tantek.com edited /quotation (+82) "/* Quote entirety with commentary */ Bridgy Publish feature request" (view diff)
#
KevinMarks That's like what medium does to post quotes to twitter
snarfed, gRegorLove, KartikPrabhu and pfefferle joined the channel
#
ashersilberman.com edited /User:Ashersilberman.com (+48) (view diff)
#
ashersilberman.com edited /User:Ashersilberman.com (+27) (view diff)