Zegnat[miklb], I should probably have defined “fiddly parts” as public-facing parts. I have no issue installing a database or whatever on a box and have it open to socket connections. I trust my self with that. It is public-facing stuff I don’t feel comfortable about doing.
petermolnarI'm guessing it's inevitable, though; I can't remember if indieweb has already encountered the question of what happens with the data of the deceased, that one that caused FB trouble as well
ZegnatThat is where I have a semi-out. Several family members use the domain as it is our family name. If anyone is still using it for their email after I die, chances are they will take over the domain payments.
petermolnar"get your smart tombstone pre-ordered today!" build in solar powered raspberry pi that keeps serving your static site by serving a wifi with a built-in dns so whoever connects can indefinitely browser your website and it won't cost any money
petermolnarsebsel off, but not that off, I'm starting to think that this is indeed a viable option to keep serving content without the need of any provider, although it'd be location/memorial restricted
ZegnatI am not sure every country will allow you to require your heirs to do something in your name. You are better off setting up a trust to do that, who are legally bound by the rules of the trust. A single IndieWeb trust might even work: leave them money and transfer your hosting/domain to the IndieWeb Trust and they keep paying the bills.
sebselrelated / also bit off: Ockels' Twitter account is still online and stopped tweeting in 2014, without any indication of his death. https://twitter.com/Ockels
sebselI block most notifications on my phone anyway, so I should not try and re-create that. But I like a place to see them all, like Facebook's world-icon or GitHub nice way of showing them per repo.
sknebelyeah, I have them in IRC only in a way where they don't create a notification or so, I just see when I come back to Quassel that the channel changed color