#dev 2017-09-17

2017-09-17 UTC
[miklb], snarfed, renem, KartikPrabhu, leg and clintpatty joined the channel
#
seblog.nl
edited /like (+370) "/* Variants */ added Strava Kudos + no undo + Medium had recommend before claps"
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
created /Kudos (+61) "prompted by sebsel and dfn added by sebsel"
(view diff)
#
seblog.nl
edited /Kudos (+596) "more dfn + expanding"
(view diff)
#
seblog.nl
moved /Kudos to /kudos "no capital per convention"
loicm joined the channel
#
petermolnar
!tell [jeremycherfas] run it on a filesystem which can do snapshots - lvm2, btrfs, zfs - and stop worrying about accidentally deleting things :) although snapshots don't always work on innodb databases, which is a problem
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
davidmead and [jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#
[jeremycherfas]
Thanks petermolnar. Getting there …
snarfed joined the channel
#
sknebel
oh great, my DNS provider is down. well, more reason to move "set up secondary DNS" higher up the to-do list once they are back...
#
petermolnar
I should self-host dns as secondary
#
petermolnar
the last time I tried it took <10s for that bind install to participate in echo attacks :/
davidmead joined the channel
#
aaronpk
for a while I was running my own bind server but it was only accessible to the Linode servers that were syncing from it
#
aaronpk
i gave up on that and just use Linode DNS directly now :-/
#
snarfed
!!! indie all the way down
#
snarfed
which was more fun, DNS or email deliverability? :P
#
aaronpk
i gave up both last year. Email was way worse
#
petermolnar
I disagree; email has a lot of components, but the initial postfix+dovecot setup is simpler than bind
#
petermolnar
though it's possible handling mail for more, than a decade left some marks on me
#
snarfed
petermolnar: email *deliverability*
#
sknebel
that seems to be one of those things that either work for you or don't
#
snarfed
eh no, it's doable, just a ton of work (DKIM, DomainKeys, etc) and black magic and a moving target
leg, davidmead and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
Yes indeed. I had to help my son understand it for his job a few months back, and it is a dark art indeed
#
sknebel
the black art is what I meant with "works for you or don't". Some people seem set everything up and it works reliably for years, others are all the time hunting issues, without any clear info why
#
aaronpk
mine worked for years until it started sending bounce spam
davidmead joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
Another dark art is email compatible html
Karish and clintpatty joined the channel
#
sknebel
for those using .dev domains for testing, Google announced that those will be added to the HSTS preload lists and thus won't work without HTTPS anymore
#
sknebel
(thre is https://ssl.indieweb.org/ to get certs ;))
#
Zegnat
I read about that. I think someone said to switch from .dev to .test, would that help? Are there any “reserved” tlds to use for dev?
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
Ownyourgram.com now wants a rel=me link?
#
sknebel
Zegnat: RFC2606: .test, .example, .invalid, the first one probably the best choice (not sure if any code actually rejects .exampele or .invalid)
#
sknebel
or use a subdomain of your domain
#
aaronpk
:sigh: google
#
aaronpk
oh well, at least i have SSL on all my .dev domains anyway
#
aaronpk
[kevinmarks]: last year when I changed OwnYourGram to scraping instead of using the API i also changed the way the setup works to use rel=me links
#
Zegnat
It does feel a little odd to do GSTS for an entire tld. I will move to .test then.
#
aaronpk
but that was in may 2016
#
aaronpk
I think .local is also a reserved TLD
#
sknebel
for bonjour/mDNS!
#
sknebel
don't use it for other things!
#
aaronpk
does it matter?
#
aaronpk
I decided to switch my dev domain setup to have the local copy of every live site I work on append .dev to the domain, so my local copy of my site is aaronparecki.com.dev for example
#
sknebel
if you really only use it on your local machine it might not matter, but over network it'll likely fail
#
aaronpk
the nice thing is I can make a wildcard cert for *.com.dev *.net.dev *.org.dev and I can use the same cert for everything ?
#
sknebel
it was common to use .local for active directory domains for a while, that caused horrible issues later on
#
sknebel
because newer devices didn't ask DNS for .local names anymore
#
sknebel
So thinking about it, .local is fine as long as you are aware of how it works and use it accordingly (e.g. if you want to use it across devices, use mDNS instead of putting it in a local DNS server etc)
#
aaronpk
i use a different TLD for stuff around my house. I only use .dev for laptop-only work
#
sknebel
there's also .localhost
#
aaronpk
so ugly tho
clintpatty and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
I thought mDNS was transparent about .local
#
[kevinmarks]
Now I need to work out how to add a rel=me to known
clintpatty, loicm and leg joined the channel
#
@m_ott
@stefanjudis I'll definitely look into it! I don't have comments on my site ATM, “only” Webmentions.
(twitter.com/_/status/909529812376711169)
snarfed and KartikPrabhu joined the channel