#[tonz]In WordPress all webmentions end up in the same moderation queue as local comments, so maybe tying it into your comment flow is an option.
[grantcodes] joined the channel
#[grantcodes]!tell jacky updating replies should already be technically possible with micropub updates on the `comment` property. But I think it would be much more complicated - both UI and tech wise - than editing most other micropub properties.
#jacky!tell [grantcodes] wait do you mean using MY micropub server to modify the visibility of a reply I've replied? If so, that's interesting - my server wouldn't be able to handle that
#Loqijacky: [grantcodes] left you a message 8 hours, 33 minutes ago: updating replies should already be technically possible with micropub updates on the `comment` property. But I think it would be much more complicated - both UI and tech wise - than editing most other micropub properties.
[grantcodes] joined the channel
#[grantcodes]Well I think you should be able to update your content and moderate comments using the existing API.
#[grantcodes]But it would probably be difficult. Especially if you're not storing everything in pure mf2
#[snarfed]specifically, aaronpk said "i'm not sure about the meta redirect question," "but a JS redirect seems like a safe alternative," which i foolishly ignored
#[tantek]aaronpk, do you think https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/253 is worth opening an issue on the Webmention spec for? Just to clarify or at least put in the FAQ (which doesn't currently mention the meta tag)
#Loqi[snarfed] #253 support HTML meta http-equiv=refresh redirects
#gRegorLoveended up being a cron issue, not following meta redirects
#[tantek]"better display" is better than "easier for [the other guy]"
#[tantek]even better would be something more specific than "better display" because the next question is better display how?
#GWGAlso, look at tantek.com...if i was less intent on consuming your site, I might have given up, for example
#[tantek]GWG, my site is not the best example for documentation because it is 1) a special case, 2) likely an edge case since I'm potentially experimenting with stuff, 3) very likely to change as I iterate given the feedback loop(s) in the community
#GWGOn the other hand...if I really want to read different sites, I should be prepared for different publishing
#[tantek]GWG, one example specific advantage could be, give your feed a specific name by marking it up explicitly as an h-feed with its own p-name
#GWGAnd explicit author as opposed to individual ones
#[tantek]I don't think we have h-feed p-author worked out anywhere so no I wouldn't pitch that
#[tantek]you can say, you should markup your feed explicitly with h-feed so that you can explicitly express at least a name and icon for the feed, and the author for the feed as a whole
#[tantek]while it may make sense to try to note exceptions in a definition or summary, it tends to be both confusing and counterproductive to understanding
#[tantek]it's better for a definition to capture typical meaning / use, and then further description to broaden that as necessary