#[jgmac1106][Zegnat] I was able to add to the admin dashbaord using YAML alone and made an interfcae for checkins pretty easily...but I could never get webmentions twork so I walked away
#[jgmac1106]but that could have been my shared host
#ZegnatIt is about the vue bits. Just couldn’t be bothered. Already digging into React&Co for work and have no interest in picking up another JS rendering thing.
#ZegnatAlso tried to get their example of a plugin for the login form to work. (IndieAuth?) And couldn’t even get that tutorial to work for me. Just gave up at that point.
#ZegnatI do really like a lot of the tech, do not get me wrong. Their static files to rendering a site is real nice and something I have played with in earlier versions of Kirby as well.
#ZegnatBut I am specifically looking for a good admin interface right now. Not something that only helps me to write code.
#[jgmac1106]if admin interfacae is goal Drupal will beat WP IMO
#[jgmac1106]plus Drupal indieweb stuff still aligned with Drupal core, at somepoint Classic Editor and Wordpress will become unsustainable
#[jgmac1106]we just redid our entire website at work from a third party CMS to Drupal I really like the interface....and you wouldn't struggle with installing and launching Drupal
#[jgmac1106]that's the part that keeps it out of reach for people
#[jgmac1106]our web dev (poor guy one person for entire university) was able to custom code a bunch of PHP Publishing UI and build them in
#GWG[jgmac1106]: To answer your question a bit more devy, this needs an API endpoint to work with Gutenberg...or to completely eliminate the need for WordPress admin
#[jgmac1106]I went through wordpress and read the notes
#[jgmac1106]now I understand a bit more. I was never a pinboard user so I didn;t have a model in my head
#[jgmac1106]I have been loving hand rolling my site with committment not to use anything I can understand/build...but it will be years before I have some functionality
#[jgmac1106]and looking closely I do not have the e-content on the h-entries for each day
[jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]zegnat the h-cite is also a legacy of me incorrectly using h-item because I had read an outdated FAQ on minimum requirements for an h-entry and didn't want a dt-published on everything
#[jgmac1106]then after tlaking to people went with h-cite, nested h-entries don't play well with parsers, atleast what Granary uses, those came up blank in inoreader
#[jgmac1106]nested h-cite either ignored or parsed..dunno, does work in RSS readers though
#ZegnatI guess I am mostly wondering why you would mark up those links with anything at all. But h-cite is fine for referring to outside content from within a post. So not saying it is the wrong choice, I am just wondering what made you do it in the first place
#ZegnatEvery h-entry (being a single say) could just have an odered list (<ol>) in its content that links to the poems in order of publication, or something like that. Would show up in all sorts of readers just fine
#[jgmac1106]yeah it was a legacy of a mistake, but I want a top level h* in case poems get different licenses
#[jgmac1106]I mean I could add a rel="license and a link to the correct CC but just feels like each poem is it's own thing
#[jgmac1106]I would want contained as an entry I could share, so it also makes them easier to move around my website modularity wise
#[jgmac1106]which is when I got what gwg is trying to do with his work
[jgmac1106], [Michael_Beckwit, dgold, KartikPrabhu, [spieper], [manton], [KevinMarks], hacdias1, [asuh] and [Grant_Hutchins] joined the channel; nickodd and dgold left the channel