#dev 2021-08-08

2021-08-08 UTC
Seirdy and alex11 joined the channel
#
[jeremycherfas]
I knew you’ld know.
hendursa1 joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d]
!tell sknebel That was it!
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
#
capjamesg[d]
Thank you!
#
capjamesg[d]
!tell vikanezrimaya The indexing journey continues. I am trying my crawler on a site other than my own. It's going well so far but suffice to say you have to do more work when you are not crawling a site you built and know inside out 🙂
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
#
vikanezrimaya
capjamesg[d]: Yeah, one's own mf2 markup might be too pure for the crawler tests. Good for ensuring the basic functionality works, but the edge cases can only be tested on different websites
#
Loqi
vikanezrimaya: capjamesg[d] left you a message 2 minutes ago: The indexing journey continues. I am trying my crawler on a site other than my own. It's going well so far but suffice to say you have to do more work when you are not crawling a site you built and know inside out 🙂
#
vikanezrimaya
Loqi, I know
#
vikanezrimaya
Oh, the joys of using matrix as a bouncer and having a persistent backlog and push notifications
jacky joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d]
How's your crawler coming along?
#
vikanezrimaya
Im currently resting
#
Loqi
sknebel: capjamesg[d] left you a message 12 minutes ago: That was it!
#
vikanezrimaya
Gathering strength to rewrite my whole database connector because a certain library has a fatal bug in it that makes my website into a pumpkin after a certain number of requests
#
vikanezrimaya
I am 100% sure now this is not my code or anything that could be caused by my coxe
neceve joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d]
n=2 but my search engine has just successfully crawled another site.
nertzy_ joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d]
n=4 and things are going better.
#
capjamesg[d]
The search engine can now fill in for missing meta descriptions.
#
capjamesg[d]
This is fun 🙂
jeremycherfas, [Rose]1, nertzy__, shoesNsocks1, bneil, eco, unrelentingtech, angelo, neceve, jamietanna1 and jamietanna joined the channel
#
jamietanna1
jacky by "an authorization attempt fails " do you mean a hit to `/authorize`?
#
jamietanna1
I can't remember off the top of my head, but I'd expect that to redirect back to a caller with an error URI, that the caller should then display something readable for?
tetov-irc, rockorager, Kai`, Zegnat[d], chenghiz_, Sam2 and [Sam_Butler] joined the channel
#
[Sam_Butler]
I've started using LinkedIn as a way to communicate above the walled garden chat communities.
#
[Sam_Butler]
Hey all, wanted to share something I've been thinking about — which comes from similar motivations as Indieweb, and indeed has some parallels to POSSE and web identity. Would love to hear your thoughts.
#
[Sam_Butler]
For this use case, and many others, it seems uncontroversial that we'll move away from centralized social networks — to networks that are more free, user-centric,  and dynamic.
#
[Sam_Butler]
I'm doing this to enable discoverability + accessibility + knowledge-sharing with my work.  Much of the professional world — at least in subject areas I'm focused on — is on LinkedIn.  By posting content and having discussions there, it enables anybody who may be interested in what I'm working on it to discover it — and likewise, me to discover them.
#
[Sam_Butler]
To start this transition, it seems that the simplest and surest first step is having access to our *graph data* — so that we can *use it* and *build/experiment on it*.
#
[Sam_Butler]
Specifically, I'm talking about:
#
[Sam_Butler]
1. Export my contacts from LinkedIn, Facebook, and other social networks, using their APIs
#
[Sam_Butler]
possible as well. )
#
[Sam_Butler]
2. Import those contacts into a new substrate/protocol, with some simple structure to help with identification.  (For example, to tell the difference between two contacts named "Amy Bee."  Or, if each of us have a "Amy Bee" in our contacts, an intelligent way to recognize if they are or are not the same person.  Email or phone number or personal domain could be a useful "anchor" for this — and better approaches could certain
#
[Sam_Butler]
3. Once I have all of my contacts accessible — I just want some simple functionality to *send messages*, and the ability to *tinker/experiment with new ways of interacting* on top of this new substrate.
#
[Sam_Butler]
Part 1 is feasible today.  Part 2 seems like it requires some dedicated thought and design.  Part 3 only comes after Part 1, and along with Part 2.
#
[Sam_Butler]
If anybody is interested in this type of thing, I'd love to hear thoughts and collaborate.  Note that this approach isn't about onboarding to a new network, it's about migrating our existing networks to a new and dynamic environment.  Also this is envisioned more of a commons / protocol initiative, not as a new network itself.
#
[KevinMarks]1
is the assumption a shared graph, or each holding our own (in effect what Signal does, where the contacts are on your own phone)
jacky joined the channel
#
[Sam_Butler]
The assumption is each person holding our own graphs (when I export my contacts from LinkedIn or Facebook, I only have access to my first-degree connections anyway)
#
[Sam_Butler]
Perhaps individuals' own graphs could be stitched together in some privacy-respecting, capacity-augmenting way — if there was consent for it
#
[Sam_Butler]
A relevant tool/reference for this could be: https://idx.xyz/
#
[Sam_Butler]
From a person in their community:
#
[Sam_Butler]
> You could issue a verifiable claim to prove that a DID owns a Web2 social account (Twitter, Github, etc.) Once issued you could store the claims in an user's IDX to link it to their DID which helps to build reputation over time/confidence that "Amy Bee" is your Amy Bee bc you can see it linked to her multiple social accounts that you recognize.
#
[Sam_Butler]
In this direction, the protocol is a decentralized public identity table. A person's unique identifier is a DID, linked to that person's individual IDX, which is comprised of that person's public accounts across different platforms (e.g. Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, email or phone?)
#
[Sam_Butler]
So instead of a source of truth based on a single address (e.g. email, phone, domain), the protocol's source of truth is a DID linked to a multitude of addresses.
#
[Sam_Butler]
That seems intuitive and directionally correct in some ways. I just wonder about IDX's business interests in this (whether they are a good building block for public commons infrastructure), and whether a different kind of architecture could be sensible
hendursaga, mgdm and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#
@GirelliGabriele
Webmentions are my way of finally letting Disqus go! I implemented a small Javascript-based project to easily show… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1424461659624648724
(twitter.com/_/status/1424461659624648724)
KartikPrabhu, hendursa1, hendursaga, tetov-irc and Rattroupe joined the channel
#
Rattroupe
Does anyone know of an indieauth client that requests and uses the profile and email scopes?
#
Rattroupe
I'm looking to test my endpoint implementation
[Emma_Humphries] joined the channel