#GWGbarnaby: Not a bad idea. I don't think we did that after the discussion that prompted that
#barnabyrel alternate seems like a weird choice for cases where you’re linking to a feed from a non-feed profile page, rather than the intended usage of linking to an alternative representation of the same content with a different content type
#GWGbarnaby: But isn't that also what rel-alternate for RSS does right now?
#GWGA page that has a rel-alternate of text/mf2+html pointing to itself would be as you noted
#barnabyafaik the intended usage is that a page showing an HTML representation of a feed uses rel=alternate to link to an alternative representation of the same content, but serialised using RSS/ATOM
#GWGbarnaby: Intended, but not actual usage in practice
#barnabywhereas the use case I was talking about, having a homepage which has no feed, and a link to a separate feed page, is not an alternate representation of the same content
#GWGbarnaby: I agree with you on the intended use of alternate. But is it how it is actually used in the wild?
#barnabysometimes? often? but not always, because once feed readers implemented rel=alternate based discovery, people started using it outside how it was intended
#barnabypublishing h-feed is so different that I don’t see much benefit to piggybacking on that discovery method, personally
#GWGMight be worthy of revisiting, being as not everyone has adopted then
#barnabyyeah reading through the archived discussion, I’m not entirely convinced
#GWGI was just advocating for better h-feed discovery.
#Loqi[snarfed] Looked into this a bit. Not easy. There are many times more `rel="alternate"` links in the average page than `rel="feed"` links, and mf2 parsers don't give us their `types`, so we either have to dig it out of the raw HTML ourselves, or fetch (at leas...
cygnoir[d] joined the channel
#GWG[snarfed]: So, your first thought is we need to have the mf2 parsers offer types?
tetov-irc, [jgmac1106], jacky, bouncepaw[m] and mro joined the channel
#jackythat post reminds me a bit of [schmarty]'s post on Webmentions
#@AlexWilsonV1↩️ Thanks for the words Rowan - and the gentle reminder to fix webmentions.
GitHub Actions & Karaoke really are the best medicine: A good reminder to always channel our inner Kelsier.
(that CLI is legitimately so dope - major OBT vibes!) (twitter.com/_/status/1497950231882829832)
#jackyI kinda want to just have a Web component like <reply-context class="h-cite u-url" href="http://magic.com" /> and let mf2 parsers do that
#jackybut in browsers, let some remote service do the magic of 'parsing' it so it looks semi-contextually relevant to its surrounding text
#jackyhm that would have to be <reply-context class='h-cite"><a href="http://magic.com" class="u-url">Url</a></reply-context> actually since href pulling it specific to <a><area><link>
#angelooh nice, i guess i'll wait for phrase search to land before i give it a whirl. good find sknebel.
#Loqi[bnfd] #272 exact match and phrase query supported?
ShinyCyril, mro, jacky, Silicon[d], corenominal[d], mro_, KartikPrabhu and [tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek]Via #indieweb-meta https://desmondrivet.com/2022/02/27/post-type-org - do we have a page somewhere that discusses the whole periodic debate that occurs here about how many (if more than one) feeds or streams one “should” publish and why or why not? I liked the path of analysis in this blog post and we need to capture more like that to help find common ground and patterns