2024-10-12 UTC
# 
trwnh hm. so would that make it an h-cite embedded in u-in-reply-to? or should i just drop the idea and not mark up the p-name of the thing i'm replying to at all? > [tantek] Not really because h-entry has an implication of a complete thing, an entry, as opposed to a reference to a thing, for which we prefer to use h-cite