2025-01-06 UTC
# 
carrvo[d] According to Wikipedia ad hominem gets a reputation of being a fallacy, but may not always be. And I think that is a fair point for Wikipedia to include because when you talk about a study or an experiment, the evidence they gather may not include all evidence there is to be had. In fact, that should be almost always impossible to achieve. So evidence can be selectively filtered (hence bias and fallacy). However, most consumers take for grant