#dev 2025-02-10
2025-02-10 UTC
MyNetAz, Chailotl, recognitium, gRegor, geoffo and grufwub joined the channel; RodrigoBorges and recognitium left the channel
#
carrvo You can do it with IndieAuth...but I haven't dug into RelMeAuth...
bterry joined the channel
[Jo], jan and jjuran joined the channel
jjuran, Dryusdan, GuestZero, nemonical and recognitium joined the channel
#
recognitium [snarfed]: Hi everybody, I am in the process of indiewebizing my site . When trying to setup snarfed bridgy with bluesky ( I have setup a self-hosted pds), after getting and app password , I get "HTTP Error 401:
{"error":"AuthenticationRequired","message":"Invalid identifier or password"}
" . Has anybody had and worked around a similar issue ? I tried searching on the web and also in bridgy's github issues, to no avail. Thanks for#
recognitium the patience
ttybitnik, Guest6, jak2k and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
[snarfed] oh nm, this is probably because Bridgy classic doesn't yet fully support self-hosted PDSes, https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/1606
Siscu joined the channel
#
doesnm doesn't fully support selfhosted pds-es <- https://bsky.app/profile/juli.ee/post/3lgsz52w6oc2g

GuestZero, sp1ff and [aciccarello] joined the channel
nemonical joined the channel
#
[tantek] hot take on "private" (misnamed) or actually limited audience posts. how to implement: (1) implement IndieAuth/RelMeAuth consumption, (2) implement "simple" password consuming/cookie setting, (3) implement per-post explicit audience allow-lists of domains and optionally one or more passwords. cc: capjamesg[d]

#
recognitium [snarfed]: Thanks a lot, I don't know how I missed that info, probably out of sleepiness and fatigue
#
[tantek] that largely aligns with my understanding. one nit about "private" that I'm increasingly wanting to solve (for myself) is splitting it into "private private" (as in no one else can ever access) and "private delegatable" (as in just for me however I could delegate access to another person (set?) in order to act "as me")

#
[aciccarello] I've thought a few times about how to implement limited-audience posts on my static site. Always ends up feeling like I'd be jumping through too many hoops.
#
[aciccarello] I'd probably require some kind of non-static version of my site.
#
[aciccarello] Some people have static encrypted files but I'd be nervous about that since you can't manage access after it's published.
#
[aciccarello] Yeah, I think for now I'll just leave myself constrained
#
[aciccarello] I don't need more complexity in my life lol
gRegor joined the channel
GuestZero and btrem joined the channel
paotsaq joined the channel
GuestZero joined the channel
#
[Joe_Crawford] they also tend to me long and inscrutable in ways where forwarding and copying and pasting can introduce damage to them
#
[Joe_Crawford] +1
#
[Joe_Crawford] hah! yes
Chailotl, GuestZero_, sebbu and ttybitnik joined the channel
#
[snarfed] [aaronpk] and for the logs, re https://chat.indieweb.org/dev/2025-02-10#t1739203065764500 , found https://guillp.github.io/requests_oauth2client/ , looks promising
bret joined the channel
#
sebbu oh, i thought of the stuff like with google (authenticator), steam, battle, adobe, twillio authy, duo mobile, microsoft, etc... where you connect on a new browser/device, and you get a notification on (all) the old ones that someone (you) tried to log in, and you can accept or refuse (or choose another 2FA)
#
[Joe_Crawford] _" warning: GH010: Your push referenced at least 20000 Git LFS objects, but we only validated a random sample of 10000. It is very likely that the remaining files have been uploaded successfully too."_
#
[Joe_Crawford] I am calling that a win.
#
[schmarty] artlung++ montecarlo++

#
[Joe_Crawford] For. Uh. 29 years worth of assets.
#
[Joe_Crawford] MIND YOU, NO VIDEOS. Or maybe like 1.
#
[Joe_Crawford] just kept doing git push over and over. different but vaguely hopeful ambiguous result each time for the last hour.
#
[Joe_Crawford] my nomination for most fun message: "GH009: Git LFS object integrity could not be checked. Please contact GitHub support."
#
[Joe_Crawford] The pain of this makes me glad a) I never tried to bring videos into my site as-is. and b) I never embarked on my "let's import all of my flickr photos into my site" project. Every prior version of me was rightly frightened to do that.
#
[Joe_Crawford] Yeah, I was kind of all in on git-lfs but having it all in one place means I can do bulk operations more rationally. It also let's me automate more parts of it, optimize thumbs, use new image technologies (uploaded my first avif yesterday). It'll also allow me to normalize the ad hoc weird WordPress code, random PHP classes, and make all the code quality better with PHPCode Sniffer and Unit tests too.
bterry1 joined the channel