#dev 2025-02-13
2025-02-13 UTC
bret and aczietlow joined the channel
#
[tantek] anyone know how Feedly consumes/parses BlueSky profiles/posts? https://feedly.com/new-features/posts/bluesky

#
[tantek] capjamesg[d], add to your AI reading list: https://gizmodo.com/microsoft-study-finds-relying-on-ai-kills-your-critical-thinking-skills-2000561788 😂

saptaks, oxtyped, gRegor, [tw2113], troojg, bookeater, bterry and grufwub joined the channel
GuestZero, GWG, nanoflite, strugee- and Viv_Slakes joined the channel
#
carrvo aaronpk, what is the difference between IndieAuth.com and IndieLogin.com? Is it that IndieAuth.com acts as an IdP that users can add to their profile and IndieLogin.com acts as a client intermediary that developers can add to their client?
#
carrvo What would happen if I had a profile with IndieLogon.com listed as the `rel="authorization_endpoint"` (or in the metadata endpoint)?
NaomiAmethyst, ttybitnik, nanoflite and nemonical joined the channel
#
[KevinMarks] I think feedly would use the bsky API we used for bsky.link

#
capjamesg[d] [Murray] Oooh, good thought!

#
capjamesg[d] I did want to allow multiple choices to be selected, but I hadn't thought about using a checkbox instead.

#
[KevinMarks] using checkboxes is clearer for that, yes

#
aaronpk carrvo: yes indieauth.com is meant to be an IdP users can use for their website, indielogin.com is a client for devs to use to sign users in. I am not actually sure what happens if you link to indielogin.com with rel=authorization_endpoint but if it doesn't currently error out I should make sure it does

#
capjamesg[d] [Murray] I'm rolling out a change now.

#
doesnm aaronpk: for me it shows "This client_id is not registered (https://indielogin.com/id)"

[Sophia_wood] joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d] Fixing.

#
capjamesg[d] Fixed!

#
capjamesg[d] [Murray] A review of the semantics would be appreciated!

#
[Murray] [capjamesg] looks good! The only suggestion I'd have is wrapping the whole thing in a `<form>` element, and use the `<button type="submit">` within the form itself to trigger the submit, but there may be a variety of reasons why you've done it the way you have and it's not strictly better my way 😉

[lazcorp] joined the channel
#
[Joe_Crawford] Perfect for Paul. Suspect people would love some reposting/share options though your prerogative capjamesg[g]++
[dshanske] joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d] [tantek] I picked ~20 or so.

#
capjamesg[d] You can read the JavaScript on the page to see which 😄

#
capjamesg[d] Oops, 37 elements.

jak2k, GuestZero_ and GuestZer| joined the channel
#
carrvo aaronpk, I will give it a try sometime in the next week I hope. It would be nice to support it but IndieAuth.com might be more appropriate.
GWG and btrem joined the channel
gRegor, nemonical, Chailotl and barnaby joined the channel
#
capjamesg[d] [Jo]++ yep!

#
[Joe_Crawford] the number was `document.querySelectorAll(':user-valid').length` triggered `onsubmit` note that it was not scoped to the form, and not scoped to only inputs, so it's possible that encompasses non-radio, non-checkbox elements
#
[Joe_Crawford] button, form, inputs I added to page may be part of that count. It's also possible there are other elements which participate in `:user-valid` (does legend? does label?)
nanoflite, Chailotl, ttybitnik, bret and sebbu2 joined the channel