carrvoThey have very different meanings. So you might find it annoying until it becomes a part of your use-case, then it would become more annoying without.
zachary.kaiFinally worked out how to follow this principle! https://indieweb.org/own_your_links Haven't implemented it site wide but it'll definitely make updating my links in the footer so much easier! Who needs a link shortening service? Not me anymore!
zachary.kai[edit] Finally worked out how to follow this principle! https://indieweb.org/own_your_links Haven't implemented it site wide but it'll definitely make updating my links in the footer so much easier! Who needs a link shortening service? Not me anymore!
zachary.kai[edit] Finally worked out how to follow this principle! https://indieweb.org/own_your_links Haven't implemented it site wide but it'll definitely make updating my links in the footer so much easier! Who needs a link shortening service? Not me anymore!
PsyLok, gRegor, Daijo, GuestZero_, thegreekgeek, barnaby, Artsie and [tw2113] joined the channel
Artsiehttp_response_code(308); // Sets the response code to a permanant redirect header("Location: https://github.com/yourprofile");// Sets location header to the right domain
[tantek]btrem, there's the "prose" of what we call things, and I prefer "footnote reference" for that as it is both complete words and very unambiguous, whereas for the ID of the thing I append "_ref" to the ID of the post, and then "-" and then the number used for the footnote reference, which is a direct copy from Wikipedia's convention for the IDs of references. similarly for the ID for the "note" part below.
[tantek]figured it was easy enough to copy Wikipedia's conventions and that their folks had already argued / bikeshed it enough to come to something reasonable