#dev 2025-05-17

2025-05-17 UTC
grufwub, JadedBlueEyes9, alephalpha0, jeremycherfas, NaomiAmethyst, geoffo, Maxpm, [mail918], barnaby, GuestZero_, [Schepp], balintm, PsyLok, GuestZero, [Ana_R], sebbu and ttybitnik joined the channel
#
capjamesg rel=edit is now in the Hugo PaperMod theme: https://github.com/adityatelange/hugo-PaperMod/pull/1741#pullrequestreview-2848364893
#
capjamesg [edit] rel=edit is now in the Hugo PaperMod theme: https://github.com/adityatelange/hugo-PaperMod/pull/1741#pullrequestreview-2848364893
PsyLok and bterry joined the channel
#
[tantek] capjamesg++
#
Loqi capjamesg has 46 karma in this channel over the last year (208 in all channels)
btrem joined the channel
#
btrem I'm part way through spinning off a footnotes plugin for 11ty. Security question regarding nunjucks templating. If my footnotes filter returns html markup in a nunjucks template, it returns the html escaped. I can chain a `safe` filter, i.e., `{{ 1 | fn | safe}}`, but that's a lot of characters for a footnote.
#
btrem I can make the filter return safe html, so I'd only need `{{ 1 | fn }}`. But are there security considerations I should be aware of? If I make the plugin available via npm or gh, I don't want to expose users. But I can't think of how it could be a problem.
shoesNsocks, kirui, Vanity3435 and rrix joined the channel
#
btrem Never mind my earlier question. I'm not going to use filters (for now, at least).
barnaby, Dryusdan, dustinm`_ and rosipov joined the channel