[snarfed]I've been talking with someone a bit about the difference between u-photo and u-featured for articles, and whether/when Bridgy Publish should include those images as attachments on its POSSE copies. https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/1934
[snarfed]right now, Bridgy Publish includes both u-photo *and* u-featured as attachments, but I'm thinking it shouldn't do that for u-featured. thoughts?
[tantek][snarfed] pretty sure I made that request before, and I believe you rejected it saying that users wanted the featured photo to show up in their POSSE destinations (perhaps Twitter?)
[tantek]so it's good to see it come around. yes, u-featured should not be POSSEd on its own as a "photo" (attachment) in destinations that support showing an embedded photo.
[tantek]i.e. if someone has class="u-featured u-photo", that should still work, and ideally, all u-featured u-photo images should be attached *before* other u-photo images, which matters for image attachment limits, e.g. if the destination has attachment limitations (1 photo, 4 photos Twitter, 20 photos IG etc.)
Loqi[preview] [snarfed] done! for all silos, not just twitter. :P cc @miklb.
(i ended up just adding `u-featured` onto the AS1 `image` field that `u-photo` already goes into.)
[tantek]another thing to capture is the reasoning of "this is here to overcome a current limitation" so that it can be re-evaluated when the limitation changes
[tantek][snarfed] was browsing the Bridgy Publish (classic) site to see which silos were still supported, and I noticed the stats link, clicked: https://snarfed.org/?s=bridgy%20stats - was there no stats 2024 post or was it perhaps not categorized to show up in this query or ? (also for 2025?)_
[snarfed]hah good eye [tantek]! yeah no Bridgy classic stats for 2024, been working on other stuff, and I also didn't really see or expect anything meaningfully new