#dev 2026-11-09
2026-11-09 UTC
thatoddshade, troojg, rMdes and bterry joined the channel
#
simpleauthority [snarfed]: Yes, classic. Thanks for the context here! I would support allowing it on bluesky, too. However, I understand why it exists in the first place. Is this only for the in-reply-to property? In that case, I could also just stop sending that property when syndicating to bluesky. Probably not a super big deal.
#
simpleauthority In fact, it might actually be the better choice for the posting service (i.e., me) to filter out properties like that to reduce the amount of control-flow Bridgy needs to do. I would just ask that we have a listing of which properties are required in certain formats for the destinations, so senders know what to and what not to include when syndicating thru Bridgy
thatoddshade, grufwub, barnaby, lain`_ and daemonspudguy joined the channel
jjuran_ joined the channel
#
simpleauthority What kind of weird? FWIW I live in SEA and my server is in Hong Kong, and I recently have started subscribing to feeds and interacting. But it shouldn't be huge amounts of traffic
#
rubenwardy Look at the ASN, it's likely a datacentrr
#
rubenwardy I got huge scraper attacks from data centers based in Singapore
#
rubenwardy I've now blocked bytedance from my server and use anubis to challenge data center IPs
rMdes joined the channel
#
rubenwardy I use Plausible and it seems quite bad at detecting bots
#
rubenwardy (self-hosted)
WinnerWind, strugee, [pfefferle] and [Murray] joined the channel
#
[capjamesg] I was reading https://www.bridgetownrb.com/showcase/custom-html-elements-everywhere-for-page-layout/ and it got me thinking how even though custom elements are valid, they still feel wrong when I am tying them.
#
[capjamesg] I wonder if anyone else here has felt that too/
#
[capjamesg] *?
barnaby and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
offeringofpie Haven't found a reason yet to use them vs established elements.
#
[Murray] I think I’d also have concerns with this approach that people would take it too far. Jared seems to have covered most of the accessibility bases for those elements, but e.g. saying that you could “just use `<paragraph>` instead of `<p>` or `<navbar>` instead of `<nav>` ” may be _technically_ true, but certainly with the latter, unless you also reinvent the roles and other affordances that `<nav>` comes with baked in, you are
pauls, rMdes, ttybitnik and GuestZero joined the channel
#
[capjamesg] thamara_k Feel free to try to send me a webmention now!
#
[capjamesg] Could someone try sending me a webmention? I’d appreciate it!
barnaby joined the channel
[aciccarello] joined the channel
#
[aciccarello] In microformats you can technically have both a u-like-of and u-reply-to on the same entry. I assume most receivers probably just show the reply but I could see some receivers showing both counts.
#
thamara_k [capjamesg] successfully sent through Telegraph
#
[snarfed] in general I doubt many consumers handle more than one (logical) type from multiply-typed h-entries. order of precedence probably more or less matches PTD’s https://ptd.spec.indieweb.org/#algorithm
#
[capjamesg] thamara_k Received!
#
thamara_k Yay! Are you displaying them on the site?
#
[capjamesg] No. I just want to have it set up in case anyone sends me one!
[artlung] joined the channel
#
[artlung] Extremely clever implementation of a “remote” https://skelly.monster
#
[capjamesg] lecaseus I didn’t. Could you tell me what URL you used to send it?
#
lecaseus I was replying to your webcrafting influences post https://jamesg.blog/2026/11/01/webcrafting-influences
#
lecaseus ohh wait I just realised my sender came back with a "webmention warning: webmention endpoint https://artemis.jamesg.blog/wm returned 400"
#
[capjamesg] Can you send me your URL? I will need to dig in to see what’s going on.
#
lecaseus this is the one I sent: https://cheztervargas.com/notes/20261110073946/
ghorsey_mobile joined the channel
#
GuestZero what's the indieweb's stance on vibecoding like, by the way?
#
[capjamesg] Ah, it’s a bug on my end lecaseus!
#
GuestZero yeah, obviously... but since spaces like this used to be showcases for loving handcraft, some gatekeeping could be fruitful
#
[capjamesg] Fixing now.
#
[capjamesg] lecaseus Received!
#
GuestZero reads great.
#
[capjamesg] lecaseus I re-sent it myself 😄
#
aaronpk if you're curious about my own personal thoughts on the matter, I wrote about it recently. it's more nuanced than you might think: https://aaronparecki.com/2026/10/17/5/rebuilding-my-indieweb-projects
#
[artlung] also see: https://indieweb.org/AI_policy
#
[capjamesg] Also, great post lecaseus! (sorry that I’m talking over everyone here; I’m done!)
#
[capjamesg] Or, rather, great comment!
#
GuestZero will definitely read later, thx aaronpk
#
[artlung] aaronpk it’s interesting that I don’t think of the work you’ve done using LLM-tooling as a coding assistance layer as “vibecoding” - the work you’ve done on extant projects has been narrowly focused on improving and modernizing existing software with a tight focus on shipping working reliable software
jjuran, ax562, deathcomestotime, luca, [Leo], rubenwardy, cobbland, [pcarrier_com], ghorsey_mobile_, kishy, Kaja and ghorsey_mobile joined the channel
