[chrisaldrich]With the #bridgy channel archived someone might want to redirect the bridgy Twitter mentions into one of the existing other channels for support which was one of its few uses.
[schmarty][jgmac1106]: any logistics things i can help with? i have a streaming rig and some of the standard consumables like colorful post-its, IWC stickers, sharpies.
eli_oat1, [chrisaldrich] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
[jgmac1106]@schmarty Yes on helping me with streaming rigs. If you want to start hounding for $100-300 sponsors. Be awesome. Once class is over and my grant done I will have more bandwidth
gRegorLovejgmac1106__, FYI, your Blogging 101s on /events are commented out; need a wiki page for them before we can show them correctly on there, at least with the one-day-event template
tantek__I'd like to do at least a draft of this (homepage update) during IWC NYC at a minimum as a indieweb.org/2018/NYC/Leaders session to start with, and possibly a session on IWC NYC day 1
Loqicalumryan: tantek__ left you a message on 2018-07-04 at 2:25am UTC: or if you'd like to propose an IndieWeb session for MozFest, feel free to use me as a Mozilla reference (tcelik @ mozilla) and note that I encouraged you to propose session(s)!
gRegorLoveHomepage "Join #indieweb chat" and "real-time log" links both end up at chat.indieweb.org now. Maybe one could be to /discuss, or just minimize it to one link.
[eddie]So I have a question. Do we see HWCs or IWCs the primary in-person entrance into the IndieWeb? The name "Homebrew Website Club" strikes me as particularly jargon-ey. But if IWCs are seen as a primary front door it might not be as big of a deal.
[eddie]I had never heard of Homebrew Computer Club before coming into the IndieWeb and I am a HUGE Apple nerd. I just had never really paid attention to the name of the club that it started in
[eddie]A replacement term will likely be VERY difficult to come up with. haha, definitely not suggesting we find a new name in the chat 🙂 Just that we might want to consider putting a possible HWC rename onto the "to do" list
[jgmac1106][calumryan] going to try and schedule leaders in morning to maximize participation. Being on the East Coast makes remote from EU possible... Sorry @mrkndvs and others in Aussie... Can't get up that early
[jgmac1106]People get scared away from HWCs sometimes when the Convo starts with, "Well I added a new endpoint to my Jekyll site so I can host image files on GitHub...."
tantek__also, while renaming is a challenge, another thing to consider is, no other group, effort, or project in this broader space has so many meetups in so many cities
tantek__I.e. it's easy to be attracted by the hopes of a theoretical unproven alternative as compared to the real-world proven but with known limitations existing working system
[eddie]Absolutely. HWC is extremely successful, I think the primary issue is the name/marketing of it. While we can incrementally tweak the meetings themselves in regard to the dev-conversations, I think the meetings themselves are pretty successful.
[eddie]I think the two main things that come to mind is 1) This is brought up because of homepage discussions. As you scroll down the page the first of two primary ways to get in-person interaction is listed as something that name-wise might turn someone away that could be interested in getting involved via Wordpress or Micro.blog, etc. 2) “success covers a multitude of blunders” just because something is successful doesn’t mean there aren’t t
[eddie]It’s really the same conversation we had about the principles page at the summit this year. Does HWC target makers of anything or makers of indieweb technology
[eddie]or we could determine HWC is for makers of anything, and continue to iteratively tweak it (potentially even the name) similar to how we are iteratively tweaking the principles page to apply to makers of anything.
[iambismark]I’m reminded of the Mac User Group I used to go to while in university… at the time Macs were still “niche” and it was helpful to have a support group to help navigate a Windows-first world. That group is now gone because Macs are no longer niche on campus. I think of HWC the same way: its helpful to have a support group while we’re still the little guys, but our goal should be to make IndieWeb so mainstream that HWC become obsol
[jgmac1106]I also think there is a role for signifiers of history like the Hombrew Website Club... Provides historical reference and "insiderness"... So I was playing more devils advocate
[jgmac1106][gregorlove] only reference I have is with remote HWC and thats its own beast... Still love the idea of reviewing homepage at /leaders NYC and then Goins live at /leaders Berlin
tantek__I lost track of where we decided / captured how to use each, so my intuition was to add to /2018/NYC/Leaders what in particular I thought was important / urgent for *that* leaders meetup, in contrast to capturing /Leaders related discussion topics in particular
gRegorLoveFor /2018/Leaders I think the confusion was copy-paste in the "Sessions" section from 2017, then people proposed new sessions on top of that. Plus we had other new issues on /Leaders at that point.
gRegorLoveThere's the line I added /2018/NYC/Leaders#Sessions "Please review 2018/Leaders#Next_Time and propose new topics on Leaders#Issues." but that's way down the page, so understandable stuff was added under "What"