#[tantek]2. Make sure tasks are evenly distributed among co-organizers / aligning strengths of organizers with tasks (maybe a few NYC organizer meetings to help get this going?)
#[tantek]GWG, we know that last time the equipment at the (now) day 1 site was inadequate / frustrating for remote participation. Though I do remember it sort of working and I think seeing [Rose] for the first time
#[tantek]It sounds like from [schmarty] is saying, we should start with #2 in that list above, as I think that's what he's saying re: "clear clusters of responsibility"
#jgmac1106[m]Think one way stream in main room, (we must supply) we have the video conference room and all other rooms wired with projector. Sound unknown
#jgmac1106[m]Other room the more chro.mebook and or ipad the better. I have access to unlimited of either
#GWGAnd Twitch is our streaming Service for everything now?
#[tantek]I think [tmiller] would also be another great co-organizer to have if she's available — has anyone reached out? Tiara, you still getting notifications here?
#[tantek][schmarty] please review https://indieweb.org/2019/NYC/Planning#Organizers_and_Areas — I tried to capture what we know for sure and link to the specific GitHub issues [jgmac1106] is using for tracking specific tasks. Definitely feel free to brainstorm and add additional tasks / areas of responsibility. Feel free to edit to clarify anything etc.
#[jgmac1106]I thought we had moved to GitHub for planning after Summit. If other co-organizers prefer wiki I am nuetral.
#[tantek][jgmac1106] GitHub is great for fine grain discussion of specific tasks and issues
#[tantek]GitHub sucks for any kind of overall planning — which, as was pointed out in /2018/NYC/Reflections by both you and [schmarty] was perhaps the key thing that that needed to be done better
#[tantek]also no, there was no "for planning after Summit" big decision like that. I recall we left it up to organizers to use the tools that work for them to be the most efficient and not let things drop
#[tantek][jgmac1106] does that split between GitHub and wiki make sense to you?
#[tantek]I only started documenting things on the wiki which were *not* in GitHub (and ill-suited for GitHub), did not duplicate anything from GitHub, linked to it instead (as one should 🙂 )
#[tantek]The other thing GitHub is not great at is quick/back forth discussion where chat works better (subsequently could link to a chat thread in GitHub comments to keep it all there by reference at least)
#[tantek]E.g. see the example we just saw above of GWG figuring out some details of remote participation
#tantek.comedited /tweetstorm (+571) "other examples: Marc Andreessen's tweet storms and the sites that archive them as blog posts" (view diff)
#[tantek]Another thing GitHub is not great at, things where you're brainstorming a number of possibilities, and people are voting on them or indicating preferences, and editing them as well. comment threads in general suck for that. E.g. why people use Doodle instead of a GitHub issue.
[xavierroy] joined the channel
#tantek.comedited /2019/NYC/Planning (+1426) "In General, github for specific tasks, wiki for areas/brainstorming, start Brainstorming with Friday Night Social venue possibilities, add last year's, and another per mention in a tweet" (view diff)
#GWGI come to enough IWCs and we shouldn't always need aaronpk
#tantek.comedited /2019/NYC/Planning (-54) "clarify tasks, vs areas, vs brainstorming, incorporate quoted tweet, CTA to add more venue options" (view diff)
#[tantek][jgmac1106] [schmarty] [dshanske] tried to capture a combination of current IWC NYC 2019 organizing, and expand to areas of need (areas of responsibility, and brainstorming options) with specific examples for each of those. Please review and edit / improve (or dispute!) accordingly! https://indieweb.org/2019/NYC/Planning#In_General
#[tantek]I like a lot of the description on https://2019.us.wordcamp.org. The "What to expect" section feels like things we'd say about IndieWebCamp as well