[jgmac1106], [KevinMarks] and [Teresa_Ingram] joined the channel
#[Teresa_Ingram]Hi lovely WebCampers 🙂 my name is Teresa Ingram and I'm founder of Opt Out, an open source set of tools designed to help female identifying people engage with healthy debate online and we're coming to the camp! I'm based here in Berlin and I'd love to help out organizing the Friday night social, just let me know what I need to do.
#[jgmac1106]good operational definition for research snarfed: I also propose the modest criteria that a site is IndieWeb in a technical plumbing sense if it has either microformats2, a webmention endpoint,
#[jgmac1106]yeah...just met with a researcher from Mozilla Corporation who is doing some work (met at IWC NYC trying to get numbers on our protocols, members, and motivations)
#[snarfed]tantek's annual state of the indiewebs at each IWS might also have stuff. i think more anecdotal though, he uses my stats for stats
#[jgmac1106]trying to show that while we have about 700 people active in chat (averaging 2500 messages) the protocls and plumbing, especially Bridgy, used by many more people not actively associated
#[jgmac1106]couldn't get a clear answer on the goal of the research project, probably bc their isn't one, but it was on the MoCo side of the fence and not MoFo, and from the "future trends" so is meant to inform possible product research rather than just advocacy
#[jgmac1106]snarfed do you keep any stats on granary?
#[jgmac1106]!tell schmarty, jeannie check out all the tweets from @bzelip he is in Baltimore...maybe Marty point him towards folks to get the Meet Up going again
#[jgmac1106]just any numbers in the aggregate, Josephine, the researcher from Mozilla I was looking at was trying to find any indicators of the size of community and building block use we have indymap, the irc logs, chatnames, bridgy sats, just wondered if their granary stats
#[snarfed]ok! indiemap is a good indicator of size of community, if outdated. bridgy is maybe ok. granary probably isn't. still, let me see...
#[jgmac1106]no rush...just curious..even any site analytics....bridgy is our best...and pushing for a new crawl...but 300 gigs in 2017...who knows how big now
#[snarfed]out of curiosity, what do you want a new crawl for? what will you use the data for? just the top line numbers? or...?
#[snarfed]ok, granary stats: its traffic averages around .7 qps, pretty steady. half of that is twitter, quarter is pure format conversion (eg html => atom/rss), quarter other silos and random misc stuff
#[jgmac1106]just top line numbers, my research is more focused on learning..granary not of interest, the Mozilla research project was trying to get a handle on the number of people using the plumbing
#[snarfed]ah ok. yeah crawling again is a ton of effort just to get a few top line numbers. we'd probably need more in depth use cases to justify it
#[snarfed](should probably also move this to #indieweb or maybe #indieweb-dev)
#[jgmac1106]...I am interested in te crawling...just not Granary..mainly because the search engine
#[jgmac1106]I'll figure out someway to get it done soon....maybe pitch it as a "wonderful data visualization" chance for students
#[snarfed]ah yeah search is a totally different problem that indiemap's design is entirely inappropriate for
#[jgmac1106]also facilitating a social network analysis MOOC soon...maybe need to work it into curicum...yeah meant more searching the mysql database
#[tantek]Is there a revenue model for search that does not depend on ads?
#[snarfed]honestly i don't think we get any value out of rebuilding search when google and others work. doing it ourselves would be a huge boondoggle
#[tantek]and Google wouldn't bother because "blog search" is an old thing
#[tantek]that's not new nor sexy nor going to get anyone promoted. so no one would work on it
#[jgmac1106]this is off from where we started with topline numbers but yeah a community opt-in search engine...you decide what post types to share...yeah not meta
#[tantek]and it's something they already killed. Google doesn't redo killed products except messaging. which they do cyclically
#[tantek]no seriously if you want to build something that Google won't, just look at everything they've killed and redo it but faster, semantic accessible HTML etc. you won't get any competition from them
#@miklbquick update on Jekyll-IndieWeb — I’ll have the demo repo using it as a theme up and running tomorrow evening. I want to use GitHub Actions so can run and build the site with additional plugins but that’s not going to make it into the repo this weekend. (twitter.com/_/status/1192862902514008064)
#LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2019-11-08.html
#[tantek]and when you get there we can see if you're able to use Mozilla's built-in zoom support in the rooms to connect to the IndieWeb zoom "rooms" so that we get archival recordings we can actually re-use
#aaronpkYou have real zoom in SF right? Not the SIP bridged one like PDX?
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "San Diego" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "San Diego is ____", a sentence describing the term)