#[tantek]at this point I'm not sure most of these edits are actually useful / on topic enough to be worth moderating (though there are a bunch of also minor improvements to existing pages, which is why I'm hesitant to take any actions) https://indieweb.org/Special:Contributions/I.colbyrussell.com
#[tantek]I’ll ask again, anyone know who Colby Russell is? Starting a undo/revert war without any participation in the community is pretty bad. Perhaps we should cite Wikipedia’s guidance for that?
#[tantek]Hence why I referenced /wikify *and* ironic that they removed a See Also link to wikify when they should have literally gone to see also wikify and read it
#aaronpkthe link to wikify is in the see also section twice
#petermolnar[[User:I.colbyrussell.com]] -> "This contributor has noped out. (Reason: "The community is too hostile—to point of detriment to its own wiki[1][2]—and about as cliquey as I suspected.") "
#aaronpkwe do tend to assume people stop by chat and say hi
#petermolnaralso, taking a revert as hostile community? Well, into you, too.
#aaronpknot sure i would describe that as "cliquey" tho
#i.colbyrussell.comdeleted /User:I.colbyrussell.com/Draft:GitHub_sucks "Author request: time to nope out; content was: "{{stub}} '''<dfn>GitHub sucks</dfn>''' is a shorthand reference to a perspective on software development undergirded by several principles, but what they all have in common is that they all support the conclusion that ...""
#ZegnatTo be fair. If I thought a community was interesting, figured out I could log in to the wiki, and thought I would help by doing some small gardening, I too would hard quit if the small gardening was immediately reverted. Would signal to me that outside wiki editting is not being welcomed.
#aaronpkalso [tantek] did misunderstand that edit, twice apparently
#aaronpkit was removing a duplicate link in the see also section
#petermolnarZegnat: no. You would have shown up in the chat and asked, hey?!
#ZegnatWould I? I have editted gaming wikis on Wikia and other such platforms a couple of times, completely without trying to reach out to existing editors ... Not sure if I would have reached out if they had reverted my work. I would have probably just taken it as rejection and moved on with my life.
#petermolnarSomeone showing up on the _wiki_ first, starting to edit is unusual, but on it's own, why not. However, not starting a discussion over an edit dispute is just plain NOPE.
#petermolnarthey made quite a few edits; the revert was for a single one in essence
#petermolnarI mean seriously... I drop by on a wiki that is apparently fairly active, start modifying content, and call the community hostile if one of those edits was reverted? What kind of mindset is that?
#ZegnatI am not saying I think they handled it especially graceful. But am saying that I might have just done the same thing. At least in as much as I would have never returned to the site *shrug*
#[tantek]petermolnar, re: what kind of mindset, to be blunt, it is an entitled mindset
#[tantek]aaronpk, yes I misunderstood the edit, twice, though only reverted once, then came back here to chat to ask others to take a look, that’s the way to involve the community in figuring out apparent disputes
#aaronpkalso ironic is the page in question is literally full of instructions on how to join the chat
#[tantek]petermolnar, agreed re someone showing up on the wiki first.
#[tantek]What *is* unusual is someone showing up on the wiki only and *creating* a bunch of new wiki pages
#[tantek]And if they think a single revert is “cliquey” oh boy wait til they try contributing to Wikipedia
#petermolnar> What *is* unusual is someone showing up on the wiki only and *creating* a bunch of new wiki pages - usually that's spam, so it's even more unusual that it wasn't a link farm.
#lahackersorry.. i didn't realize clicking the "rollback" hyperlink actually performs an action nor did i realize i had done it otherwise
#lahackeri've never used that feature before.. i just did it again.. ALL UNINTENTIONAL, sorry, just going to leave it..
#[KevinMarks]If you're used to Wikipedia, you might expect the conversation about edits to be in the talk page
#Zegnatlahacker: it is a wiki, hard to break it. But if you need some help, do ping in here :)
#lahackerjust did some investigation.. woke up, scrolled back through the logs, saw tantek asking about colby, clicked through to see what the hubbub, poked around trying to see /what/ the rollback was, clicked the blue underlined thing that said "rollback", landed on a page that didn't jive, went to get my coffee
#lahackerso i had landed on the page after colby had returned to fix tantek's first mistake
#[manton][tantek] Just catching up… The name doesn’t sound familiar. (I never got everyone’s name who used to come to HWC, though, so could be I’m forgetting.)
#[tantek]thanks [manton], appreciate you checking.
[Raphael_Luckom] joined the channel
#LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2020-11-27.html
#[tantek]anybody want to write a quick blog post about the IndieWeb Gift Calendar day 1 coming up next Tuesday for the newsletter?
#tantek.comedited /Gemini (+6) "simplify dfn from being marketingy to having some potential relevance to IndieWeb, note lack of source of blockquotes and marketingy nature of claims" (view diff)
#[tantek]alright so has Loqi learned how to deal with DST / non-DST yet or are we mere minutes away from the final version of the newsletter?
#[tantek]i.e. Loqi claims "sent out at 3pm Pacific time" but is that actually true, or is Loqi still stuck in DST and thus will send it out actually at 14:00 PST
#ethanyooRegarding the confusion with no one knowing who Colby Russell is, I joined the wiki this week as ethanyoo. I'm sorry if I should have introduced myself here before doing so.
#Zegnatethanyoo: no requirement at all to introduce yourself first :D Although we do enjoy getting to know more people! Welcome.
#ZegnatIt is just not often people start editting pages on the wiki without having attended an event or having interacted in chat in some way. Which caught some people by surprise.
#tantek.comedited /mute (+357) "/* Alternative to multiple feeds */ note multiple feed files attempt and publisher burden" (view diff)
#tantek.comedited /mute (+498) "/* Alternative to multiple feeds */ connecting silo UI innovations here to possible IndieWeb approaches" (view diff)
#Loqi[Event Updated] tantek.com updated "Oct 21, 2020 6:00pm Homebrew Website Club - Everyone from North and South America At Once" changed cover_image "cover image should be about the event, not the photo taken at the event" https://events.indieweb.org/event/173/history/676/diff
#LoqiA colophon is a page or section, like a footer, of a site that describes how the site is made, with what tools, supporting what technologies https://indieweb.org/colophon