@DEGoodmanWilsonTrying very hard to understand the #indieweb and how to implement various bits of it, but I'm finding the resources at http://indieweb.org essentially incomprehensible. Is there a better resource for the complete beginner? Does this even exist? (twitter.com/_/status/1466393142404472834)
aaronpkit's not really surprising, the getting started page is written to people who are really just getting started from nothing, and then all the headers under "indieweb self-starters" describe the what, but not the why
gRegor, [fluffy], jooo, angelo and [manton] joined the channel
[manton]I wonder if Getting Started should be split into multiple pages? There’s a lot of info on that page… I can see how someone would get lost trying to figure out what they need to know.
[manton]Or more advanced topics at least put somewhere else. Running a home server, URL-shortener, etc. are all things that very few “getting started” people will need.
[tantek]1we need to capture examples we're encountering of "I'm a smart/experienced/technical person and I'm confused by Getting Started" because they are helpful both for improving the actual Getting Started, and point to ways we can improve /welcoming to help guide folks to understanding that expertise in one area doesn't mean everything is unconfusing
[tantek]1[manton] hard to tell, if you check the Bridgy/webmention stats, traditional CMS's (WordPress, Drupal) dwarf both of those "2 main paths" combined.
[manton][tantek] I guess both, potentially… Perhaps it’s not quite right but I was thinking there’s a difference between people who are basically going to need to work in HTML directly (adding link tags, JS, whatever) and people who mostly need to configure existing tools and plug-ins.
[schmarty]including basics like "have my own content on my own domain" but also "interact with other indieweb sites" and "allow other indieweb sites to interact with me"