#meta 2022-08-01
2022-08-01 UTC
# edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-popups (-10) "update from https://events.indieweb.org/tag/popup" ( view diff)
# OSB 2015 - Micropub: The Emerging API Standard for IndieWeb Apps - Aaron Parecki https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YM1Y85zKZbQ #IndieWeb ( twitter.com/_/status/1553893302696656899)
sebbu and maxwelljoslyn joined the channel
# edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-popups (+0) "update from https://events.indieweb.org/tag/popup" ( view diff)
# I think that now the @OpenSourceOrg blog is fully capable of receiving #webmentions from Twitter thanks to #IndieWeb folks and http://brid.gy. More tests in the next few days. ( twitter.com/_/status/1553917770269503489)
[marksuth] joined the channel
# edited /Super_Follow (+75) "[tantek] added "https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/super-follows" to "See Also"" ( view diff)
angelo, [Jacob_Hall] and [schmarty] joined the channel
# ↩️ The web is decentralized and doesn't have version numbers #indieweb ( twitter.com/_/status/1554014671438581760)
# edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-popups (-154) "update from https://events.indieweb.org/tag/popup" ( view diff)
# ↩️ John Menario was city manager who oversaw #portlandme urban renewal projects. Sure, I've got some things to point out after reading this, and I think it's valuable for what it says about thinking *today* by... city hall maybe.… https://indieweb.social/@jamesecradockjr/108747502049695194 ( twitter.com/_/status/1554074966378876935)
# Introduction to IndieWeb on WordPress https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsPjdk2-m68 #IndieWeb ( twitter.com/_/status/1554074524777332736)
nertzy, AramZS and angelo joined the channel
# ↩️ yes but as per Occam's razor "simple but no simpler than that" - this is "One of the reasons", not the entire reason, if it was then yeah, why not use an RSS feed. But then: why aren't the masses already using this approach that's been available for decades? Not enough incentive. ( twitter.com/_/status/1554109011016007680)
# ↩️ Oh wait I think I get what you're saying. I'm saying new tech can create new incentives yes ( twitter.com/_/status/1554110537528647680)
# ↩️ And to solve incentives new tech is the thing that we need? ( twitter.com/_/status/1554109746902351874)
# ↩️ Right, my own perspective on it is that the tech is mostly fine but that we’re stuck in a https://xkcd.com/927/ and hence are gaining no momentum ( twitter.com/_/status/1554111920290111488)
[benatwork], [jeremycherfas], nertzy, cambridgeport90 and jacky joined the channel
# ↩️ A nascent field will have more competing standards/whatever & less obvious winners *because* it’s nascent.
The comic is a call to pragmatism toward an industry with status seeking characteristics, some of it via unnecessary new standards or other busy work.
/2 ( twitter.com/_/status/1554128348456050688)
# ↩️ Hahaha - this conflates multiple things and it’s about context and nuance.
History is littered with competing standards. Being wrong a lot until someone gets to “good enough” is essentially how our species progresses in any area.
/1 ( twitter.com/_/status/1554127564817448960)
# ↩️ How do you apply what you’ve said to this context without it essentially meaning “Don’t innovate because there’s already people innovating”?
4/4 ( twitter.com/_/status/1554129549369155584)
# ↩️ The point of the comic is “be practical” and tbh that’s exactly what we’re doing.
Lots of competing standards in nascent areas makes sense and is completely normal. Consider frontend JS before React.
/3 ( twitter.com/_/status/1554129202269536260)
# ↩️ Rather than throwing away existing building blocks and forcing unnecessary rewrites and possibly alienate existing communities, causing competition and rivalry:
Invite and collaborate on the things you have in common and focus the innovation on the parts you don’t share. ( twitter.com/_/status/1554131087093387266)
# ↩️ Easy:
- Focus on incremental / iterative building blocks
- Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water and throw everything away to focus on a universal holy grail
I guess this is the classic debate between rewrite vs refactor though. The evolution vs revolution debate. ( twitter.com/_/status/1554130647844884481)
[aciccarello] joined the channel
# ↩️ 100% (maybe not specific things you have in mind, but absolutely yes) ( twitter.com/_/status/1554132235267325952)
# ↩️ And have you analyzed that the non-p2p / http nature of eg Instagram is the main shortcoming that keeps it centralized? ( twitter.com/_/status/1554132175976599553)
# ↩️ Are you building on any of the existing efforts for metadata around decentralized / federated / indie social networks?
That was after all what the initial tweet in this thread was about. ( twitter.com/_/status/1554131694533447684)
# ↩️ I should mention the p2p primitives we're using have openly been a thing for about 10 years now, we're just building on those building blocks ( twitter.com/_/status/1554131344489332738)
# ↩️ You can read more about the principles of the IndieWeb here: https://indieweb.org/principles ( twitter.com/_/status/1554131282208210945)
jacky joined the channel
# ↩️ https://hypercore-protocol.org/
https://dat-ecosystem.org/
+ the primitives cater to the areas described
We'll be open sourcing literally everything, then you can integrate it with whatever favourite projects you like. ✌️ ( twitter.com/_/status/1554134715900350469)
# ↩️ yeah I mean, let's not go in circles I've already covered this. Nascent industry is filled with innovation, these are all great projects, all different goals. Interoperability is a good future consideration.
This is a case of code wins arguments, so hopefully you'll see in time. ( twitter.com/_/status/1554133821481689090)
jacky joined the channel
# ↩️ I know these things, and I’ve been working with @mafintosh to launch a newspaper on it, which would have been a great thing.
Social networks though, I can’t see it solving any of the critical things there, but if it does, then the @IndieWebCamp community would be very interested ( twitter.com/_/status/1554135475790700545)
[Murray] joined the channel
# ↩️ I guess this one can need some updating: https://indieweb.org/Dat ( twitter.com/_/status/1554138573942784001)
# ↩️ @davidmarkclem @keet_io @indiewebcamp Well, eg. SWAT0 was defined 10 years ago as a tech independent test for decen… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1554134960923189251 ( twitter.com/_/status/1554134960923189251)
# @davidmarkclem @keet_io Let me disagree. There is no technical limitation for the data to be private in the old client/server architecture; there is no limitation to keep the user data in a non-accessible format in p2p. Also, p2p is very often non-web. ( twitter.com/_/status/1553781247230492676)
# @mafintosh @matteocollina @davidmarkclem @keet_io We already have the ability to own the hardware hosting the data. That’s not the main problem. The main problem is maintenance ( twitter.com/_/status/1553785416519647232)
jacky joined the channel
# @jsumners79 @matteocollina @davidmarkclem @keet_io Most users don’t wanna buy more hardware to host data. They already own powerful computers/phones. ( twitter.com/_/status/1553786751596089348)
# Really happy to see that webmention-handler is starting to get some usage by people other than lil 'old'me. #webmentions #indieweb #webdev #opensource
https://github.com/vandie/webmention-handler ( twitter.com/_/status/1554150756374151171)
gRegor and [manton] joined the channel
nertzy joined the channel
# This whole thread reads like a description of #indieweb.
http://indieweb.org ( twitter.com/_/status/1554180456265920513)
gRegorLove_ joined the channel
# deleted /File:micro-panel-screenshot.png "Outdated"
# edited /Micropub/Clients (-56) "/* Micropanel */ update url, remove outdated screenshot" ( view diff)
jacky joined the channel
nertzy joined the channel
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel
jacky, IWSlackGateway, tommorris_, omz13-, stevestreza_, IWDiscordGateway, [James_Van_Dyne] and sebbu joined the channel