aaronpkIt would, but I haven't seen anyone say anything in there other than people asking why the ActivityPub test suite is broken, and someone added notices whenever there's an email list post, so I don't know how useful it would be
diptera.casacreated /Gopher (+2061) "Created page with "{{stub}} '''<dfn>Gopher</dfn>''' is a protocol alternative to [[HTTP]] which has existed since 1991. Similar to the much younger [[Gemini]] protocol, Gopher pages – so called ''gopher holes'' – usually don't take a lot of resources to load and to host. While [[browser | web browsers]] like [[Firefox]] used to support the protocol, nowadays a web proxy or a gopher browser are necessary to view gopher pages. One example for a well-known web browser that still supports..."" (view diff)
diptera.casacreated /Gopher (+2061) "Created page with "{{stub}} '''<dfn>Gopher</dfn>''' is a protocol alternative to [[HTTP]] which has existed since 1991. Similar to the much younger [[Gemini]] protocol, Gopher pages – so called ''gopher holes'' – usually don't take a lot of resources to load and to host. While [[browser | web browsers]] like [[Firefox]] used to support ..." (view diff)
[tantek]was just about to say, the /Gopher definition needs to directly include the present IndieWeb relevance, and that article needs an IndieWeb Examples section as the creator of the article's personal domain supports Gopher according to https://indieweb.org/User:Diptera.casa
[tantek]If I can find one more person to commit to showing up, I will create an informal IWC DUS lobbycon event in the lobby of the NH hotel for the conf and we can take it from there
LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2023-03-24.html
[tantek]I think I'm going to do this as a fallback practice in the future, if no one has "fixed" a new page to be indieweb relevant before the newsletter, delete and whoever added it can try again after
[tantek]gRegor, the flipside is that no had the time/interest to fix it in time, so rather than have something go in the newsletter that shouldn't, deletion is a better fallback
[tantek]also frankly it read mostly like a Wikipedia summary which we really don't want nor need so it's not clear that fixing that page was better than deleting and having someone try again
[tantek]it was mostly a generic page about Gopher (like a Wikipedia summary) with a brief "IndieWeb relevance" section that was purely theoretical and didn't cite any actual IndieWeb examples nor even specific IndieWeb brainstorms
capjamesgIf we could, it would be nice to have a sentence on the wiki that says "hey, remember that indieweb relevance is key -- make sure your definition is clear why this page pertains to the IndieWeb."
capjamesg"Thank you for contributing to the wiki! A few things to keep in mind: (i) make sure your definition clearly relates to the IndieWeb; (ii) add an example to the page so readers understand relevance; ..."
capjamesg[tantek] I understand your points, and I care a lot about the wiki being relevant to the community. A nudge on the create page itself would be helpful.
capjamesg""Thank you for contributing to the wiki! A few things to keep in mind: (i) make sure your definition clearly relates to the IndieWeb; (ii) add an example to the page so readers understand relevance; ...""
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "mediawiki customizatiomn" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "mediawiki customizatiomn is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[tantek]so asking people to both join chat and state an intention here in #indieweb-meta before they create their new page seems like a good solution to that
Loqi[preview] [[tantek]] was just about to say, the /Gopher definition needs to directly include the present IndieWeb relevance, and that article needs an IndieWeb Examples section as the creator of the article's personal domain supports Gopher according to https://indieweb....