gRegor, [Al_Abut] and [KevinMarks]1 joined the channel
#[tantek]gRegor, sounds fine to me. I think people have different opinions on whether "chat" or "discuss[ion]]" is more welcoming but having now seen both for too long and used them semi-interchangeably I have less opinion on that
#[tantek]strong +1 on naming the purpose (Collaborative notes) instead of the tool (Etherpad)
#gRegorSame, I'm neutral on discussion vs chat in heading. I used "join the #indieweb chat" in the prose in that section.
#[tantek]"Notes" by itself may imply there's "someone else" taking notes and and loses the implied/invited collaboration meaning of "Etherpad"
#gRegorpositive maybe? searching "discuss" or "chat" in the page will get you to that section now
#tantek.comedited /egg (+3186) "subsections, issues, How to filter, Twitter dropping eggs" (view diff)
#[tantek]^ I blame sknebel for the unintended nerd snipe. Since Wikipedia doesn't document the Twitter egg phenomenon and it does involve silos (and is thus on topic for our wiki), I documented a bunch of references / citations / quotations (that maybe one day could be used to stub a Wikipedia article)