[tantek]Photos of other people come to mind. It was one thing for the surveillance apps to index all publicly viewable photos (that was bad enough) but…
[tantek]It’s potentially much worse IMO when GenAI photo scrapers are used to create fake images of people without their consent, often in gross ways 😔
[tantek]there are similar metaphors like retail stores are open to the public by default, but that doesn't grant anyone permission to come in and steal things
[tantek]of course this is kind of being "tested" right now with all the influencers going into grocery stores and filming themselves making snarky points for their various channels
[tantek][mattl] I'd say the party at your house is more like a "friends-only" set of posts / permissions rather than open. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding your "house" 😆
[tantek]it could also mean "public space" like sidewalks, public parks etc. in most public parks you're also not allowed to take things like plants or animals. that doesn't make them "not open"
[tantek]that said, there are public parks with streams and perhaps there's a good analogy here where you're allowed to drink from a stream (as a human, take your own risks on the water quality), however you're not allowed to siphon off all the water into your tanker and go sell it as "stream water".
[tantek]does that make the stream not "open"? I don't think so, it's still open to individual humans to experience and use, it's just not open to exploitation
trwnhanyway, the thing about scrapers is that i generally don't care to discriminate against them, as long as they aren't costing me anything. standard caveats apply (public is public, etc) so if you want to meaningfully change anything then you need some basis for applying policies to requests, and you need to make licenses discoverable in a standard way (insofar as anyone respects licenses, or otherwise if they disrespect your license you can
trwnhthe foundation of maintaining expectations for your resources is to never share your resources more widely than you intend to. i would wager that the vast majority of personal information is actually *not* something that should be made fully public. in most cases you want to have some idea of how far that info will spread and what people will do with it. "who wants to know?" is a common contextual modulator
trwnhopen access is useful for things that should be public, like scientific findings or datasets. but if you want access control then the open web is not very good at providing that... whereas something like facebook can easily provide that.
trwnhthe problem is that we don't have a really good foundation for identity that can be used to authenticate an http request, or a bearer token or capability management system that can be used to authorize an http request
[tantek]I wish there was a way for a site to ask (and get confirmation either cross site via oauth or via the browser) is this person logged in via GitHub, mastodon, indulging etc? Like not their identity, just a Boolean
[tantek]That would be enough to enable say “read full post” permissions on something you don’t want scraped (and then you to rely on those IDPs banning bot accounts pretending to be human)
[tantek]^ this is just one off the top of my head brainstorm for a solution that does not require a “really good foundation for identity”. I’m sure there are plenty of others
aaronpkyou’d definitely need the user to confirm before sharing the boolean value with the site, so figuring out the right prompt to show the user would be tricky
[social]In my Complexity / Social Lenses I have a lot of work on the public, private, and in between space (the transitional space, like a front porch) and the advantages and how to work through building it.
[social]I have pieces I’ve included around Social Comfort as well. I use this rather than trust to help understand boundaries and what is public, private, and the in between space.
[social]I need to dig. I have some public talks / presentations, but much of it was workshops. A lot of it was helping large companies sort it out. I may have written up chunks of it. I have a long write-up I did around Google+ and its problems with boundaries (there really weren’t any that were clear and not porous.
[social]The downside of doing work for large companies (and doing it well) is it focusses on their distinct needs, technologies in place, but also how they deal with rick and compliance. The other piece is this isn’t public facing work, but often under NDA for long stretches.
[social]The loss of SlideShare functioning properly after it left LinkedIn means a lot of that stack of things I had public in presentations is now hard to find and use.
LoqiSlideShare is a presentation hosting/sharing silo, owned by LinkedIn, which is now owned by Microsoft, that requires Javascript just to navigate to next/previous slides https://indieweb.org/SlideShare
LoqiGlitch is a service that shutting down project hosting and user profiles 2025-07-08. It allowed you to quickly prototype web applications in a complete IDE with built in version control, sharing, custom domain support, and more https://indieweb.org/Glitch
LoqiGlitch was a service that allowed people to quickly create static and NodeJS applications in a browser or by importing a git repo. The shut down project hosting and user profiles on 2025-07-08. It allowed you to quickly prototype web applications in a complete IDE with built in version control, sharing, custom domain support, and more https://indieweb.org/Glitch
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "free domains" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "free domains is ____", a sentence describing the term)