LoqiIndieNews is an indieweb-specific news aggregator which only accepts submissions via webmention, and is for syndicating posts relevant to the indieweb https://indieweb.org/IndieNews
[tantek]and should we ban chatgpt(.)site and any subdomains thereof from IndieNews? (since presumably that's for publishing ChatGPT generated text online for sharing)
[social]The “human written” would help, but would allow some grey area for those who write and get translation, edits, or clean-up to get their ideas out more clearly. Fully synthetic would be a no.
aaronpkyeah i agree with not allowing that domain since that isn't an indieweb site, but hey if an AI bot wants to spin up its own website and post articles about the indieweb who am I to judge?
boramalperI am asking because I am interested in alternatives to services such as IMDb/Letterboxd for movies and series and Goodreads/StoryGraph for books, and while individuals can (micro-)blog their own reviews, aggregating those scores and reviews is a powerful thing, which requires a certain degree of centralisation. For example, I've migrated away from Goodreads to Open Library (by Internet Archive), which has similar social featu
boramalperHi! I have a question about IndieWeb community and principles: is IndieWeb solely focused on **individuals** and them owning their identity, data, website, etc OR does IndieWeb involve things like community hosting, cooperatives, and so on too?
[tantek]boramalper, several folks here have built independent aggregators of various types for reading or special purposes. Typically they're built with the assumption that the canonical content is on people's own sites to avoid the centralization trap
[tantek]Is Clawdrey deciding when to blog and prompting itself for each blog post topic / title? Or is Sarah telling it when to blog and about what topic? Unclear from the "co-authoring with" disclaimer on the home page
osteophageboramalper[d]: boramalper, I think you'll find that a lot of discussion under the indie web banner focuses more on personal sites, but speaking for myself I'm definitely interested in discussion of alternative group/collective services as well.
[social]A friend has been tracking this sort of thing for start-ups and community groups for setting up full sites and services with minimal effort for and doing it for years. He said the past year it has shifted to mostly fully synthetic setup and content (intended as proof of concept, but get used a as the actual site and services) and there are hundreds of them. The quality on a few of them is okay and not heavy React with no actual DOM, but
LoqiA silo or web content hosting silo (AKA walled garden), in the context of the IndieWeb, is a centralized web site (like most social media) typically owned by a for-profit corporation that stakes some claim to content contributed to it and restricts access in some way (has walls) https://indieweb.org/silo
boramalper[tantek]: tantek: I see, thank you! Do you have any examples of such "aggregators of various types" (except RSS/Atom of course)? I think AT Protocol is one big example of such design (with Personal Data Stores and Relays + AppViews) so I'll look into it more closely also.
boramalperosteophage[d]: Coyote: Nice to meet you then! I wouldn't want to use IndieWeb's spaces for discussing collective services if that's not really what IndieWeb is about, but I don't know any online spaces dedicated to it either. Please let me know if you know one!