2012-08-30 UTC
tantek, tantek-ipod, lgedeon and gp5st joined the channel
# 01:59 gp5st i'm looking at the schema.org and microformats.org geo definitions, there is not (optional) field for planet or body. what would be the proper way to go about proposing that?
# 01:59 aaronpk :) I was wondering how long it would take for someone to ask that
# 02:01 gp5st i run a site about mars and thought that microformats would be useful. i hate the idea of just augmenting the standard on my own site. the other option is just for people to assume that any coordinates are about mars, but in theory they could be for other bodies (planet, moon, asteroid)
# 02:02 gp5st i'm looking at the mars one (sorry i'm going through this slowly:-\_ and i don't like the idea of rooting it differently for every body
# 02:03 gp5st i hadn't got to the extentions before you showed me. that looks pretty much like what i was envisioning
# 02:05 gp5st awesome:) sorry for asking before reading everything
# 02:05 aaronpk it's ok! I wouldn't have thought to go look until you mentioned it
# 02:06 gp5st i love the idea of embedding all of this data, i'm just sad it'll take a while to fully implement on my side:)
# 02:11 gp5st i have to go. my wife and I are setting a no electronics after 10pm rule
# 02:11 gp5st take care! and thank you!
kennyluck, teleject and kennyluck_ joined the channel
# 04:43 columbuswoodall created /index.php?title=Mediawiki (+3287) "New page: Look at the Email : You will be informed by the bureaus with their analysis outcomes through mail. They're going to notify you should the product ended up being validated or removed. Cont..." (
view diff )
chiui joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
# 06:45 ChiefRA [05:10] <gp5st> i have to go. my wife and I are setting a no electronics after 10pm rule
# 06:45 ChiefRA :)))))))))))))))))))))))))
# 06:45 ChiefRA this is something
# 06:45 ChiefRA so after 10pm they watch the stars and the moon out of the window perhaps as the TV is an electronic device.
# 06:46 ChiefRA or even better, the love eachother deeply :))))
jkridner_ joined the channel
# 08:04 ChiefRA tantek did you see any real life implementations on microformats 2 yet?
# 08:05 ChiefRA do you heard/know if Google started to support this?
# 08:24 tantek ChiefRA - folks from Google have been asking about it. Which is usually a good sign.
# 08:24 tantek I think there are further simplifications we can make too.
romainneutron joined the channel
# 08:53 ChiefRA tantek I believe so, but I was wondering if Google accept and recognize them yet.
nonge_, csarven, iwaim_, xtof_fr and romainneutron joined the channel
ChiefRA and MacTed joined the channel
barnabywalters joined the channel
csarven, globbot and ed8 joined the channel
# 18:07 tantek also: re: Google and uf2, not yet as far as I know. we don't usually find out until after they start supporting something.
# 18:07 tantek btw have you tried using microformats2 yourself with any of your markup to see how easy or hard it is to add to your existing markup?
# 18:09 tantek barnabywalters - I was looking at your home page to see how you marked up your stream, and checking out the hAtom, when I noticed this: </p><p>16:22:05</time></p>
# 18:09 tantek it appears you may have some unbalanced / overlapping open/close p tags!
# 18:10 tantek and also, for the hAtom, you'll need to put the published updated class names on the actual time element, not on the surrounding div
# 18:11 tantek once you've gotten all that taken care of, I have some questions for you about your experience with microformats, and in particular with h-entry (if you've taken a look at it)
# 18:12 barnabywalters tantek: weird coincidence, I am currently going through all my new markup and applying mf2 to it in a more intelligent way
# 18:12 tantek good then this is a good time to ask about uf2 h-entry
# 18:13 tantek my experience with it so far is that it seems like some of the class names are either redundant with existing microformats2 class names or unnecessary
# 18:13 tantek note that I mapped h-entry directly from hAtom hentry as a first attempt
# 18:16 tantek there, finally hit save on a page I was editing last night and fell asleep before saving apparently
# 18:17 tantek the "entry-" distinction has made no difference in practice.
# 18:18 tantek and now that we have the standard default class name of p-name in microformats2
# 18:18 barnabywalters plus for notes where the content *is* the title, the result is rather ridiculous: entry-content entry-title p-entry-title p-entry-content p-entry-summary
# 18:18 tantek initially we mapped the Atom spec's exact semantics for entry title, summary, content to hAtom
# 18:18 tantek well, almost - you can omit the *-summary in that case :)
# 18:19 tantek so with hAtom for notes you have: entry-title entry-content
# 18:19 tantek for h-entry, I'm trying to simplify this to: p-name e-content
# 18:20 tantek I don't see much if any of a practical / relevant difference between a "summary" in hCal/iCal and an entry "summary" in hAtom/Atom
# 18:21 barnabywalters tantek: 'summary' is one of the few bits of data which is consistent across all my content types
# 18:22 barnabywalters is there anywhere the various prefixes are explained? I was confused by them initially
# 18:23 tantek I need to move that up to a higher section - you're the second person to give that feedback
# 18:24 tantek I claim that for all practical purposes that's the same semantic (between iCal and Atom)
romainneutron joined the channel
# 18:24 barnabywalters well I can't think of any use cases off the top of my head where a summary *isn't* supposed to do that
# 18:24 tantek and I don't see anyone evolving Atom at this point to diverge from that
# 18:24 tantek "It is not advisable for the atom:summary element to duplicate
# 18:24 tantek atom:title or atom:content because Atom Processors might assume there
# 18:25 tantek so I don't think "entry-*" adds any relevant semantic
# 18:25 tantek I think this is what we've learned in our years of experience with hAtom
# 18:26 tantek so switching from "entry-content" to "content" (in practice e-content or p-content) is an obvious thing to do to
# 18:27 tantek well, p-name is the more broad "name of the thing" as you see it / publish it
# 18:28 barnabywalters fn always confused me. I could never remember whether or not it was full name or forename
# 18:28 tantek (so many people are confused by "fn", and so many people also independently invent a "name" property instead)
# 18:28 tantek so we already decided that's getting fixed in uf2
# 18:30 tantek so I think it is reasonable to say instead that authors typically publish the *name* of an entry, and it's often *displayed* as a title
# 18:30 tantek in practice "title" is rarely a semantic (except in vCard/hCard where it really means job-title)
# 18:30 barnabywalters this is particularly relevant from an activitystreams POV, e.g. object title vs something like "Barnaby posted a note"
# 18:31 tantek so I dislike the term for that reason - in practice it doesn't convey a semantic, it conveys a presentation
# 18:31 tantek think about: title of a book vs. name of a book
# 18:35 tantek also, "name of an article" wins over "title of an article"
# 18:36 tantek however, "name of a book" is 44m vs. "title of a book" 7.5m in gsearch result counts
# 18:37 tantek even if we give title the benefit of the doubt and allow for "book title" - that's only 16.4m results
# 18:37 tantek "name of a book" crushes "title of a book" and "book title" COMBINED.
# 18:37 barnabywalters although I would use name to refer to the name and title to refer to the actual printed title
# 18:38 tantek English has evolved to shift to using "name" rather than "title"
# 18:38 tantek as per the evidence of Google searches of web publishing
# 18:38 tantek it's time to deprecate "title" as any kind of a generic semantic, and maybe relegate it only to things like "job-title"
# 18:39 tantek and h-entry to Atom processors can simply convert the "p-name" to an <entry:title> for legacy backcompat purposes.
# 18:41 tantek I think benward had some doubts when I first posed it as a possibility quite a while ago - I wonder if he's changed his mind.
# 18:42 tantek Phae? aaronpk (since you've been working with hAtom a bunch) ? hober (since you <3 bikeshedding :) ) mkowens (always insightful) ?
# 18:43 tantek or anyone else in the channel who has an opinion, especially if you're familiar with (and even use/publish) hAtom
jkridner_ joined the channel
tantek_ and romainneutron joined the channel