2013-02-24 UTC
# 00:00 impomatic The only thing not really marked up is the publisher.
gjones, bnvk and zztr joined the channel
# 02:10 tantek are those going on a particular page on the web?
bnvk, adamovy, chiui, tobyink, nonge, jkridner_ and romainneutron joined the channel
# 14:26 tommorris tantek: ping. back on british soil. had a crack at doing h-cite to bibtex. the semantics match up quite nicely.
manu1 and bnvk joined the channel
bnvk joined the channel
# 15:47 tantek tommorris - that's pretty funny (about Ruby getting ISO8601 wrong)
# 15:49 tommorris and now my post grumbling about it is on the front page of hacker news
chiui joined the channel
# 16:03 tommorris note to future generations: sorry about the technological singularity not happening, we're still struggling with date-times.
# 16:05 tantek tommorris, did you mean "I hope Rails apps [are] doing input validation…" ?
# 16:07 tommorris so, I was looking at h-cite to BibTeX. the only problem I'm having is that BibTeX requires a "type".
# 16:08 tommorris so, h-cite to bibtex seems like a very, very compelling use case.
# 16:09 tommorris to roll it out on somewhere like Wikipedia, it'd be very useful to be able to export to BibTeX.
# 16:09 tommorris hence why I'm looking at it. I've spent loads of time writing BibTeX by hand
# 16:09 tantek "type" is such a horrible vocabulary term to mean anything. so overloaded.
# 16:10 tommorris @book{Smith2005, title = {My book about things}, author = {John Smith}}
# 16:10 tommorris type is just what I'm using to refer to the word that comes after the @ and before the {
# 16:11 tantek some made up hierarchy of crap like schemaorg?
impomatic joined the channel
# 16:17 tommorris but still ridiculously useful and in daily use by academics, students and others.
# 16:20 tommorris BibTeX annoys me in many ways, but still widespread in academia. ensuring we can get data out as BibTeX is a really compelling and easy win.
# 16:21 tantek interesting. I wonder what this world is that consumes BibTeX.
# 16:22 tommorris mathematicians, academic computer scientists, some philosophers, some physical scientists
# 16:22 tommorris some of the academic journal publishers offer BibTeX for download
# 16:23 tantek sure, that's for retrieving BibTeX - but who actually consumes it?
# 16:24 tantek might be interesting to write a BibTeX -> h-cite converter for taking existing BibTeX data and using it as referencing in blog posts.
# 16:24 tommorris BibTeX to h-cite is easy. there are a fair few implementations of BibTeX parsing
# 16:24 tommorris I've been using the Ruby BibTeX library (hence my grumbles about ISO 8601 date formats in Ruby)
# 16:25 tantek wow bibtex (screw their capitalization, don't need it for understanding) predates the web!
# 16:27 tommorris there's a huge amount of cruft management in the tex world
# 16:27 tommorris like, the transition to support Unicode. because obviously (la)tex predated Unicode
# 16:29 tommorris when compiling a bibliography recently, the process often involved:
# 16:30 tantek so even google books bibtex export can't get it right then
# 16:31 tantek we have a better chance with h-cite to bibtex?
# 16:33 tommorris yeah. I'll have a dig around and document on both microformats.org and wp
tobyink and bnvk joined the channel
bnvk, chiui, Atamido, zztr, eschnou, tobyink and impomatic2 joined the channel
bnvk, tobyink, zztr and impomatic2 joined the channel