#microformats 2013-08-12

2013-08-12 UTC
#
tantek
edited /existing-rel-values (+231) "/* HTML5 link type extensions */ add rel=webmention, since it has a specification, and implementations"
(view diff)
#
tantek
edited /pingback (+108) "note webmention as replacement"
(view diff)
tantek, iwaim_ and shaners joined the channel
#
tommorris
edited /Special:Log/protect () "protected "[[make real money online]]": spam [create=sysop]"
(view diff)
#
@StepUpWeb
hCard — формат, предназначенный для публикации контактной информации http://www.step-up-web.ru/hcard/
(twitter.com/_/status/366803206744981504)
ChiefRA, waterbaby999, tobyink, nonge_, barnabywalters, oliveiraev and TallTed joined the channel
tealmage, bnvk, singpolyma, jgay, romainneutron and tobyink joined the channel
shaners and tantek joined the channel
#
tantek
shaners, well done. you've provoked the editor of the JSONLD spec into writing a very childish blog post that beyond trying to argue your points, succumbs to plenty of baseless attacks
#
tantek
found via @kevinmarks
suderman joined the channel
#
tantek
I would hope that no one here would resort to mocking animated gifs to substantiate their arguments, as that post does.
#
aaronpk
lol I like how the counterargument to shaners point about machine readable data formats changing every couple years is "At no point has any core designer of JSON-LD claimed 1) that JSON-LD will “solve our problems” (or even your particular problem), 2) that it won’t change, and 3) that it will be supported forever."
#
tantek
we have other venues for mocking gifs: http://w3cmemes.tumblr.com/
#
tantek
aaronpk - indeed, that reads like a lengthy admission of shaners's point
#
tantek
shaners, welcome to the you've-been-mocked-by-a-prominent-semweb-person club
#
aaronpk
LOL "There have been no new Microformats released in the last 5 years" and "the mailing list traffic has been almost non-existent for around 5 years"
#
aaronpk
perhaps there should be an email update posted to the list directing people off of email and suggesting using IRC and the wiki
#
tantek
aaronpk - maybe we could get an automated posting once a year or something :)
#
aaronpk
lol yeah
#
tantek
it is pretty ironic - though one could be excused for missing all the progress we've made among the wikispam in recentchanges
#
Loqi
MISS ALL THE PROGRESS http://loqi.me/7mg
#
tantek
I mean, it's not like there haven't been well attended presentations, talks, on microformats in the past year, with video on youtube of all the advances ;)
#
tantek
aaronpk - indeed. really gets to the heart of any of manu's argumentative posts.
#
aaronpk
yea, ough
#
tantek
the post is a clear emotional overreaction, not indicative of a response that would show a desire for rational discussion/clarification
#
tantek
I've basically deprioritized posts like that.
#
tantek
too much productive/rational work to do with productive/rational people first.
romainneutron joined the channel
danbri, tealmage, tantek and singpolyma joined the channel
#
Hixie
wtf is json-ld
#
tantek
Hixie - lolololol
#
Hixie
no really
#
Hixie
is it just another serialisation format for RDF?
#
Hixie
basically a JSON vocabulary for describing RDF quads, the way that RDFa is an XHTML extension vocabulary for describing quads and the way RDF-XML is an XML vocabulary for describing quads and the way n3 and turtle are dedicated syntaxes for describing quads?
eschnou, shaners, tealmage and romainneutron joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
#
bret
I mean, I get the impression that people feel the need for extensive vocabulary standards
#
bret
hence schema.org, RDF, JSON-LD and activity streams
#
tantek
bret - some of them have some use-cases, others, do not
#
bret
right, it just seems odd not to build off of the one that exists in the wild
#
tantek
some of it is historical, some cultural, some ego
#
bret
tantek: what about the uF2 search engine support statement?
#
bret
didn't Bret or Brad talk to you about that this year?
#
tantek
which statement? URL?
#
bret
i though I OH something
#
bret
lack of uF2 support in search engines
#
bret
that was one of the pieces of criticism in the JSON-LD rebuttal article
#
tantek
I don't know of any support yet - there's no definitive proof either way until either someone see something working (positive result), or a search engine representative makes an official statement of non-support.
#
tantek
hah - as if search engines index JSONLD or any JSON at all. hilarious.
#
tantek
what we do know is that as specific microformats are adopted and published, search engine support increases over time
#
tantek
same thing previously happened with hAtom
#
tantek
and is likely to happen in the (near?) future with h-entry + h-card
#
bret
tantek: isn't payswarm working with mozilla on some payment stuff?
#
bret
thats what I was told in their IRC room a while ago
#
tantek
not that I know of. i'd say whenever people make claims about mozilla like that, ask for a URL that proves it.
#
bret
heh ok. I'm to trusting
#
tantek
it's what happens when people ignore and/or make fun of your technology for so long (RDF)
#
tantek
people get defensive and/or exaggerate to compensate
#
tantek
the semweb crowd are known for making exaggerated and misleading claims (e.g. claiming that FB OGP is "RDFa", and then later redefining RDFa to include an "og:" default prefix)
#
tantek
pretty ironic for a crowd which advocates figuring out how to communicate "trust" on the web
#
danbri
tantek, that's not a very nice thing to say
#
tantek
danbri - happy to provide citations
#
tantek
e.g. Peter Mika's post about RDFa adoption - included plenty of OGP which was not RDFa (per the spec at the time)
#
danbri
it was buggy rdfa
#
tantek
danbri - it was meta tags 2.0
#
tantek
even to call it buggy rdfa is an exaggeration
#
danbri
it was also not to your taste
#
tantek
intent of rdfa was to provide an RDF-like way to markup visible data, like microformats
#
tantek
none of FB OGP is marking up visible data
tealmage joined the channel
#
danbri
it was more about bridging the gap
#
tantek
calling OGP meta tags 2.0 is more accurate than calling it RDFa
#
tantek
what you call "bridging the gap" - I'm calling intentional exaggeration
#
tantek
danbri - if you want to go way back - all the shenanigans around "RSS" "1.0" / Winer were pretty bad too
#
danbri
how far back do you want to go?
#
tantek
you claimed "not a nice thing to say", I provided citations.
#
tantek
I've basically given up on hearing actually precise statement about adoption from semweb advocates.
#
tantek
which is pretty ironic
#
tantek
since greater precision is often given as a reason for extensible / distributed vocabularies, namespaces, etc.
#
danbri
"I had a few hours on Christmas morning to do some experimenting and planning. It looks like there's an opportunity for us to add to the MCF standard. It also looks like it's happening, so it's time to jump on the bandwagon and start digging..."
#
tantek
danbri - critiquing winer does nothing to remove criticism of behaviors by semweb folks
#
tantek
"they do it too" or "he did it first" are never a defense
#
tantek
you know better than that
#
danbri
i criticise specific semweb people's behaviour too
#
danbri
i try to avoid sweeping generalisations about "semweb types" (or microformat types)
#
danbri
(unless i'm saying something nice, hopefully)
#
tantek
indeed there are exceptions
#
tantek
have had plenty of discussions with tommorris for example (who is one such exception)
#
danbri
e.g. I thought quoting someone else saying 'rdfa is microformats done right' in http://www.slideshare.net/mark.birbeck/the-5-minute-guide-to-rdfain-only-6-minutes-40-seconds was needlessly hostile
#
bret
we are all just trying to make each other better right? :)
#
tantek
he's pretty blatantly up front about success/failures
#
tantek
bret - if only that were so
#
tantek
the semweb stuff has been ugly politically for quite some time
#
tantek
danbri - indeed, have also seen statements like "microdata is simpler than microformats" - without any evidence substantiating it (examples etc.)
#
danbri
simplicity isn't simple
#
tantek
no it isn't
#
danbri
most things i see from you on the topic of rdf are pretty critical of it
#
tantek
danbri - do you have an HTML version of that slide deck? I've grown allergic to PDF/PPT about web tech
#
tantek
danbri - true - like many things, I see it as more complex than necessary to actually handle real world use-cases.
#
tantek
anything with namespaces for data (including XML etc.) has this problem
#
danbri
I have keynote and didn't like it's other saveAs options, sorry ... not proud of the format choice there
#
bret
i would say my first semweb experience last week was pretty political… the activity streams people were not happy with schema.org
#
tantek
bret - yeah that was pretty ugly
#
bret
I didn't understand his answer about not using a more familiar license
#
danbri
is OWF less dead than PoCo?
#
tantek
schema-org claims to be about unifying existing disparate/divergent conversations/vocabularies, but even where there is existing convergence/communities (vCard/VCARDDAV, activities/ActivityStreams), schema-org still decides to fork/reinvent.
#
tantek
danbri - apples and oranges
#
tantek
licenses != formats
#
danbri
the person schema.org vocab dates from before i got involved
#
bret
In my measly experience is more about making confusing documentation :/
#
bret
it is*
#
tantek
danbri - not pinning any problems with schema-org on you, to be clear
#
tantek
all the problems I know of pre-date your involvement
#
danbri
thanks
#
tantek
happy to clarify that as often as necessary
#
tantek
you've at least tried to bring people together on the public-vocabs list, and for that I'm grateful
#
bret
Like, it was unclear why I need to scope my website as a website in MD? Isn
#
bret
t that assumed?
#
danbri
there are ways in which schema.org is closer to microformats than most earlier RDF work - e.g. caring more about publisher simplicity (whether or not that is achieved is another matter)
#
tantek
bret - you asked for CC0, Guha, claimed they already do CC-BY which is more liberal (which is actually not true). my guess is he's just not familiar with CC0 (presuming ignorance in this case rather than malevolence)
#
tantek
danbri - agreed.
#
danbri
there are ways in which microdata learns from both rdfa and microformats (without framing either as obsoleted)
#
tantek
the hot debate about property vs. rel in RDFa was quite informative
#
bret
i don't know much about CC0 other than it is used on a few common things, someone else prob should have asked the question
#
tantek
bret - it's ok, it was a good question
#
danbri
and there are ways in which microformats-2 moved closer to things RDF long cared about, like a common entity/property/value data model beyond the markup
#
tantek
CC0 is where modern standards licensing is at. it used to be CC-BY a few years ago.
#
tantek
danbri - well, arguably closer to microdata than RDF
#
tantek
and we're (re)learning the property vs. rel problem too
#
tantek
and lesson
#
danbri
which was Hixie's reworking of RDFa
#
tantek
sort of
#
tantek
I don't think he ever claimed to fully rework RDFa
#
danbri
so the fact is there are respectable amounts of all these things out there
#
tantek
but rather come up with something microformats-like, but more generic, that handled the use-cases provided by RDFa-advocates
#
tantek
danbri - this is an example of the kind of exaggeration I speak of
#
danbri
So http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019681.html sort of dismantles RDFa and rebuilds it in a more HTML-friendly way
#
tantek
you saying "Hixie's reworking of RDFa" I view as an inaccurate exaggeration (of the relevance/influence of RDFa)
#
tantek
"dismantles RDFa" is also inaccurate (perhaps your reading into it)
#
tantek
because all he did there were list use-cases presented to him, without any specific tech being referenced
#
tantek
someone else might have dismantled RDFa
#
tantek
but Hixie certainly didn't
#
tantek
and claiming he did is false
#
danbri
I always thought it was quite well positioned between the two works
#
danbri
and thought it quite funny-tragic that you more or less embraced it, while RDFa enthusiasts were filled with outrage and denounced it
#
tantek
danbri - right. that's another instance (
#
tantek
"filled with outrage") of the kind of general reactions I speak of
#
tantek
RDFa advocates worked hard to try to get RDFa *required* in XHTML2
#
tantek
and when that ship sank
#
tantek
they tried the same approach with HTML5
#
tantek
political adoption rather than independent market success
#
tantek
bundling rather than modularity
#
tantek
speaks to a lack of self-confidence in the technology
#
danbri
it's 11.30pm here, can we pause the complaining about my friends for a bit?
#
danbri
otherwise i'll have this stuff bouncing around my head when i'm going to sleep, which is no fun
#
danbri
happy to pick this up next time I'm in bay area
#
tantek
ok danbri let's switch the topic to something more positive then, and we can continue discussions/citations of misbehavior later
#
tantek
have you tried adding any microformats2 to your own site?
#
danbri
not yet
#
bret
it takes ~6 minutes
#
bret
assuming you can get to your templates
#
tantek
bret - you made a particularly poignant statement about how long it took you to rip out microdata vs. add microformats2 earlier - was that in IRC or on your site?
#
tantek
(during osfw3c workshop)
#
bret
that was IRC, i wanted to reblog it though
#
bret
burried in colloquy logs
#
bret
And yes, its fair to count the community help I received as part of the the ease of adoption
#
tantek
edited /microformats2 (+200) "/* v2 vocab to-do */ analyze how well microformats2 satisfies the use-cases used to design/create microdata"
(view diff)
#
danbri
if I make some microformats2 hacking time, it'll more likely be with parser code and content from others' sites
#
danbri
closer to dayjob concerns
#
tantek
danbri if you change your Twitter link on your danbri.org home page to use https you should have enough setup to use danbri.org with IndieAuth (and thus login to the #indiewebcamp wiki)
#
danbri
is this relmeauth revisited?
#
danbri
i tried some code for that a year or so back but couldn't get it running
#
tantek
danbri - it's the best implementation of relmeauth to date
#
tantek
and in the past couple of weeks, aaronpk has figured out how to federate IndieAuth (which was based on relmeauth)
#
bret
errrr
#
bret
wait
danbri joined the channel
#
bret
ill probably write a little more some day
#
bret
as it was one of those things that was difficult to figure out what to do just by googling… came down to trying stuff and talking to people
#
tantek
bret - good to know
#
tantek
I do think community makes all the difference
#
tantek
and there's no community around microdata / schema.
#
bret
yeah, no way
#
tantek
(typical with top down corporate things)
#
bret
i found one website with some sampls
#
bret
samples
#
bret
and it was difficult to look at the schema.org vocabulary wall, and understand where to start
#
tantek
yeah - that's a bit of a mess
#
tantek
talk about overdesigned. sheesh.
#
bret
this is my favorite
tealmage joined the channel
#
aaronpk
quantify all the things!
#
Loqi
QUANTIFY ALL THE THINGS http://loqi.me/7mj
shaners joined the channel