tantekthat's not true - aaronpk finally figured out that's what he needed to be using (instead of writing hacks) - though I forgot the precise use-case
kylewmso if you get a "content", expect it to be a list of objects with "html" and "value" and instead get a list of objects with arbitrary properties + value
tantekhmm - perhaps that webmentions "in-reply-to" use-case is why we decided that "u-in-reply-to h-cite" made more sense? and then the rule about the value of a u-* property with a nested object coming from the u-url of that nested object?
tantekthus for an "e-content", you get a list of objects with "html" and "value", and if one of them has nested microformats, then that object also has "type" and "properties" for that nested object.
tantekseems like a pretty smooth enhancement for the nested object case, without disturbing those clients that are just looking at objects with "html" and "value"
tantekedited /microformats2-parsing (+118) "/* parse an element for class microformats */ make it explicit that e-* h-* re-uses the e-* { value:"" } structure (insetad of creating another level of { } structure) - per question/point from kylewm" (view diff)