aaronpke.g. http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2#h-adr h-adr lists "p-locality" as one of the properties, but in reality, the parsed result shows just "locality" and can have a value there by one of many different prefixes
rhiaroI think that having prefixes listed under the vocabularies is confusing for people who haven't realised they're for parsers, and it looks like they're constraints on how terms should be used
rhiaroI also think listing properties under h-*s - whilst I understand they're a guide to which make properties in which contexts - is also confusing as it implies constraints that aren't there
rhiaroOne of the things I noted about mf2 was that it doesn't over constrain like many RDF vocabs do - I wouldn't want to presume how people are going to want to use terms in the future
aaronpkKevinMarks: my point is the parser prefixes don't appear in the parsed result, so they aren't part of the vocabulary, they are just publishing guidelines
aaronpksimilarly, the "in-reply-to" property is expected to be a URL, and if it's actually an h-cite object, the value can be found in in-reply-to.value
kylewm!tell glennjones when you have a chance I'd love if you could review this PR https://github.com/glennjones/microformats-testrunner/pull/2 ... There's an Apache project that's apparenntly interested in using mf2j, I'd love them to be fully informed about how ready/no ready it is for production :)