#microformats 2016-07-06

2016-07-06 UTC
tantek_ and nitot joined the channel
#
@WpWarez Rich Snippets for #Rating System (Add Ons) - #Like #Microdata #Microformats #RDFa http://wpwarez.com/rich-snippets-for-rating-system-add-ons/ https://twitter.com/WpWarez/status/750483571668836352/photo/1 (twitter.com/_/status/750483571668836352)
nitot, tantek, gRegorLove, KevinMarks, KevinMarks_, KevinMarks__, KevinMarks___, MeanderingCode, Loqi, dogada and uf-wiki-visitor joined the channel
#
@Webprotech Guide the #web #developer to implement microformats or #schemas for products and reviews. http://www.webpro.in/technical-seo-services/ (twitter.com/_/status/750598927368478724)
tantek, nitot, tantek_, KevinMarks, KevinMarks_, elux, adactio, Garbee, gRegorLove, TallTed, KartikPrabhu, M-RyanRix and miklb joined the channel
#
tantek edited /microformats2-parsing (+330) "note stability in status section and explicit strict change policy per issues filed in response to implementation experience" (view diff)
KartikPrabhu, nitot and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
#
@loicmathaud @jkphl so this evening I hacked a bit on my site to add some microformats, it was HWC at home ;) (twitter.com/_/status/750795742126759938)
tantek joined the channel
#
tantek I have been asked by W3C to document how we have been raising, resolving, and making spec edits for microformats2-parsing issues.
#
tantek Issue captured here: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/1
#
tantek Proposed resolution: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/1#issuecomment-230912142
#
tantek Would appreciate some feedback on the proposal (even if just in the form of "thumbs up" reactions etc.)
#
tantek !tell tommorris,gRegorLove,kylewm,willnorris,aaronpk,barnabywalters,bear,GWG,kevinmarks as someone who has participated in microformats2-parsing issue discussions / resolutions in the past year at least, could you offer your opinion, even if just a summary +1/0/-1 on my documenting of our existing rough processes here: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/1#issuecomment-230912142
#
Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
#
tantek hoping all that text fit
#
bear loqi messages?
#
Loqi bear: tantek left you a message 1 minute ago: as someone who has participated in microformats2-parsing issue discussions / resolutions in the past year at least, could you offer your opinion, even if just a summary +1/0/-1 on my documenting of our existing rough processes here: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/1#issuecomment-230912142
#
Loqi :)
#
aaronpk looks like it fit
#
Loqi aaronpk: tantek left you a message 3 minutes ago: as someone who has participated in microformats2-parsing issue discussions / resolutions in the past year at least, could you offer your opinion, even if just a summary +1/0/-1 on my documenting of our existing rough processes here: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/1#issuecomment-230912142
#
bear i'm +1 on your proposal - well written but concise - sets out proper expectations and responsibilities
#
tantek just made a minor modification noting the the 1+ implementation requirement is only on aspects of a proposal that affect implementations
#
tantek for example, proposals to document change control don't have anything themselves that should impact an implementation
#
bear yes, lots of projects mistakenly mix process changes with implementation changes
#
tantek figured it was good to make that distinction
#
bear tantek++ for having clear change process language
#
Loqi tantek has 302 karma
#
tantek bear the intent is that there should be no surprises there
#
tantek it should reflect our existing practices
#
bear exactly
#
tantek should I include something for minor editorial edits not needing issues and can be reviewed (and if necessary reverted) after the fact?
#
tantek like for typos
#
tantek I feel like there's been enough edits of that sort that it may be useful to point that out
#
aaronpk probably, otherwise there's ambiguity in whether someone coming to the site is allowed to fix stuff like that
#
bear that is a common call-out
#
bear PR request for typos are ok as long as they don't change the structure or meaning of a sentance
KevinMarks_ joined the channel
#
bear that ^^ will allow you to stop comma removal or the like
KevinMarks and nitot joined the channel
#
tantek bear, something like
#
tantek Purely editorial changes (e.g. fixing minor typos or punctuation) that do not change and preferably clarify the structure and existing intended meaning may be done by anyone without filing issues, requiring only a sufficient "Summary" description field entry for the edit. Similarly, questioning any such change may be undone without filing an issue. Any further reversion or iteration on such an editorial change must be follo
#
tantek up by filing an issue however.
#
bear +1
#
bear I normally try to get revisions done as a PR tho
#
bear as the urge to revert means a discussion needs to happen
#
bear oops s/revisions/revert changes/
#
tantek bear, I'm figuring that allowing both an initial editorial edit, and a reversion of it, is sufficiently conservative (i.e. it just returns to previous state) to allow without explicit process
#
bear that's a good point - +1
#
tantek however once that has occured, any further such iteration / change on that spot requires an issue
#
bear nods
#
tantek should stop edit wars before they start
#
tantek thanks for the review bear
#
tantek bear++
#
Loqi bear has 150 karma
#
bear yvw
#
KevinMarks That's good too.
#
Loqi KevinMarks: tantek left you a message 35 minutes ago: as someone who has participated in microformats2-parsing issue discussions / resolutions in the past year at least, could you offer your opinion, even if just a summary +1/0/-1 on my documenting of our existing rough processes here: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/1#issuecomment-230912142
#
tantek edited /citation-examples-markup-fr (+61385) "Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/QuickBooks|QuickBooks]] ([[User talk:QuickBooks|Talk]]) to last version by [[User:AmeerDawood|AmeerDawood]]" (view diff)
nitot, tantek, KevinMarks_, KevinMarks, KartikPrabhu and Loqi_ joined the channel