#microformats 2017-03-03

2017-03-03 UTC
rMdes and tantek joined the channel
# 00:26 
Zegnat Throwing in the question here, will read if there are any answers in about 8 hours time after I have slept: was there ever a standardised way for mf-parsers to read the .type of a .tel?
# 00:27 
tantek Zegnat - there have been no .type of a .tel use-cases since the switch to mf2
# 00:27 
tantek in the real world
# 00:27 
tantek so basically, no, not for 8 years
# 00:29 
Zegnat Hmm, alright. I am publishing some data I wanted to make parsable by mf-parser, and the datapoints are all based one 2 sub-data points. guess I’ll just go with .p-1-a, .p-1-b, .p-2-a, .p-2-b, etc. It could’ve made sense to do .p-1 of type "a" has value "..." and .p-1 of type "b" has value "...".
# 00:30 
Zegnat is not making sense and should sleep
# 00:30 
Zegnat Good night all
# 00:30 
Loqi night
# 00:31 
tantek sleep well!
pniedzielski[m], martymcguire[m], [cleverdevil], [eddie], KevinMarks_, [keithjgrant], tantek, nitot_, KartikPrabhu, jonasbits_, MeanderingCode_, [chrisaldrich] and [dgold] joined the channel