#microformats 2017-09-30

2017-09-30 UTC
#
@Noith_CA hentry （マークアップ: http://microformats.org） 構造化データエラー が出たときの対処方法 http://column.noith.com/hentry-error/?utm_source=ReviveOldPost&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ReviveOldPost (twitter.com/_/status/913944381685559297)
tantek, nitot, [tantek], davidmead, [miklb], [eddie] and [ob] joined the channel
#
strugee hey all
#
strugee I'm reading http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-me - am I right in thinking that rel="me" is just specified in XFN? so it can't be considered a separate spec?
#
Loqi rel="me"
#
strugee separate/standalone
#
strugee (for context I'm adding rel-* specs to Specref)
#
strugee also in http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-enclosure I'm assuming the author section means Kevin Marks _of_ Technorati, Inc.?
#
Loqi rel="enclosure"
#
tantek hey strugee
#
tantek normative reference for rel=me is XFN 1.1
#
tantek see the rel registry for which specification which rel value is specified in
#
strugee tantek: thx
#
strugee should I be looking at the registry instead of http://microformats.org/wiki/Main_Page#rel_microformats?
#
Loqi Welcome to the microformats wiki!
#
strugee tantek: would you have time to do a quick pass on the Specref PR when I submit it? you're more familiar than I am with the specs/process
#
strugee if so I'll cc you
#
tantek you may be able to automatie that from the tables in the rel registry: http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values
#
Loqi existing rel values
#
tantek strugee - you don't me - you can verify directly ^^
#
strugee ah great
#
tantek e.g. the table here http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#formats
#
tantek scroll down to the "me" value
#
Loqi existing rel values
#
tantek note the right-most column "Link to defining specification "
#
strugee right
#
tantek etc.
#
strugee thanks tantek!
#
strugee I'll probably send some patches to all the SocialWG specs that need these too
#
strugee when it's done
#
tantek cool
#
strugee sorry, got another question - http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag says "Microformats Specification" in the sidebar but the header says draft spec
#
Loqi rel="tag"
#
strugee does that just mean "this is what the draft was when it became a living standard"?
#
tantek yeah
#
tantek in practice a lot of the "draft" microformats, especially if older, are effectively frozen, like enough stuff has been built on top that they can't really change
#
strugee ok
#
strugee makes sense
#
strugee they should still be cited as Draft Standards though, yeah? until "upstream" is fixed?
#
tantek they're basically draft because no one has committed time/resources to create test suites, document results etc.
#
tantek "living standard" is the closest accurate summary though
#
strugee makes sense, but which should go in normative references?
#
strugee sorry, I feel like I'm bikeshedding a bit
#
tantek I guess I don't know what context you mean so it's not making much sense
#
tantek like what you're asking sounds abstract, so I would just put something generic like "standard" without indicating any status or anything else
#
strugee tantek: I'm adding entries to the Specref database so I don't know exactly where they'd be used, but places like the "Normative References" section of W3C documents, etc.
#
strugee similar to https://github.com/tobie/specref/pull/370
#
Loqi [strugee] #370 Add microformats2 specifications
#
strugee also are the people listed on http://www.gmpg.org/xfn/11 the authors of XFN as a whole?
#
strugee sorry for the flood of questions :/
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks] Me of Technorati, yes
#
[kevinmarks] (Technorati at the time that is)
#
strugee [kevinmarks]: great, thank you!
#
strugee sent a PR, btw, and waiting for CI to be green: https://github.com/tobie/specref/pull/395
#
Loqi [strugee] #395 Add microformats2 rel- entries
KartikPrabhu joined the channel