#microformats 2018-04-05

2018-04-05 UTC
chrisaldrich, KartikPrabhu, [cleverdevil], j12t, hober2, jmac_, [jgmac1106], tantek, aaronpk, [aaronpk], bdesham, [miklb], [ryan339], [snarfed], j12t_, barpthewire, Garbee, [kevinmarks] and [colinwalker] joined the channel
#
@MJ
↩️ @green_grainger @t this is old school microformats
(twitter.com/_/status/981799189620260864)
Loqi, aaronpk, pniedzielski[m] and schmarty joined the channel
#
echimahgitu
edited /rel-author (+50) "/* query param issues */"
(view diff)
#
echimahgitu
edited /rel-author (-6) "/* query param issues */"
(view diff)
[pfefferle], [colinwalker], [kevinmarks], Garbee, [jgmac1106], kaushalmodi and [miklb] joined the channel
#
schmarty
^ tantek: lots of spam
KartikPrabhu, tantek, kaushalmodi, [kevinmarks], [jgmac1106], j12t, [snarfed], chrisaldrich, barpthewire, [chrisaldrich], [jjdelc], [miklb] and [gerwitz] joined the channel
#
@ChrisAldrich
↩️ It's not http://Brid.gy, instead it looks like it's caused by the microformats and their placement in your particular theme. https://brid.gy/about/#microformats You can find a preview of what Bridgy will publish at https://brid.gy/twitter/spigot if you want to test before sending.
(twitter.com/_/status/981988822446673920)
[sdepolo] and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
@spigot
↩️ Thanks for the feedback Chris. I’d like to get this stuff dialed in, I’ll be looking into the microformats issue. The preview will only work on published posts it seems. So the workflow would be to publish post > preview > publish via bridgy
(twitter.com/_/status/981991766415978496)
[kaushal_modi] and tantek joined the channel
#
@HeNeArXn
↩️ from a quick peek at your markup, it seems like the problem is that there is a "hfeed" class, which is handled as microformats v1. Since it wraps the entire article, the properties inside it don't get added to the "h-entry", and it thus tries to guess the content.
(twitter.com/_/status/981996564192419841)
#
aaronpk
backcompat strikes again
#
sknebel
was a bit weird about the recent issue, that it almost seemed the parsers not following the spec gave better results than those that did
#
sknebel
but nobody reacted to the questions about that
[gerwitz], KartikPrabhu, tantek, Patxi, [colinwalker] and j12t joined the channel