#microformats 2018-05-27

2018-05-27 UTC
#
KartikPrabhu hmm ok done-zo fixed. mf2py now works purely on a copy of the original doc
tantek_, [grantcodes], [miklb], tantek and [Natris1979] joined the channel
#
@steve_mellor WordPress Words: Microformats https://cstu.io/f92fc5 #wordpress #websitedesign #webdesign #webdev (twitter.com/_/status/1000594977238536192)
[jeremycherfas], barpthewire and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#
Zegnat gRegorLove++ for confirming the PHP isue with the mutating DOMDocument.
#
Loqi gregorlove has 29 karma in this channel (237 overall)
#
Zegnat A `clone` was enough according to the unit test I wrote. Thankfully, else we would have needed some DOM-cloning-function. PR at the ready! (Though CI tests still pending at the moment.)
#
@jgmac1106 Successfully added microformats2 to @cogdog’s Dimension WordPress theme so your calling card will play nice with #IndieWeb tools. Almost 90% of the updates can be done using just the customizer and the custom menus. You will have to add one line to the… https://jgregorymcverry.com/2917-2/ (twitter.com/_/status/1000727605463670784)
[jgmac1106], barpthewire, nitot, tantek, davidmead, [miklb], KartikPrabhu and Ian joined the channel
#
tantek KartikPrabhu++ for the proposed text in https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/2#issuecomment-372150186
#
Loqi kartikprabhu has 24 karma in this channel (203 overall)
#
Loqi [kartikprabhu] Absence of `[alt]` is different from `[alt=""]` https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#Omitting%20this%20attribute (fragmentioned URL) So I suggest the following modification to @gRegorLove 's suggestion - else if `img.u-...
#
tantek now I just have to review it and make sure it does what consensus discussion wants it to do
#
KartikPrabhu cool. this is under a flag in mf2py for now since it would be a breaking change so it can be tweaked
#
tantek yeah that's quite the change
#
KartikPrabhu would have to bump to a major version to make this default
#
tantek still as long as you're not at v1.0 yet, you can make breaking changes with v0.1+
#
KartikPrabhu we are at 1.1.0
#
tantek when did it get bumped to v1+ and why? missed that
#
KartikPrabhu that happened a long time ago when mf2py became a bit more "stable" and implemented lot of the vcp and backcompat stuff
#
KartikPrabhu Oct 5 2015 according to https://github.com/microformats/mf2py/tags
#
KartikPrabhu tantek: add thoughts on implied photo alt parsing to https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/2
#
Loqi [aaronpk] #2 image alt text is lost during parsing
#
KartikPrabhu will track that one from now on
#
tantek right, it looks like there is consensus on a spec change, and you've prototyped it in mf2py right?
#
tantek which means I think I can make the spec edits.
#
KartikPrabhu in the experimental version not released yet
#
tantek yes that's fine, you've proven it *can* be implemented, and that it works as expected right?
#
KartikPrabhu yup
#
tantek have to run now, but will evaluate the spec edit proposal and makes sure spec edit preconditions have been met
#
tantek thanks for the ping
#
tantek looking forward to resolving this one (which has been an important contribution by way of Micropub - thanks aaronpk - for quite some time)
KartikPrabhu, [Vanessa], [miklb], [tantek] and tantek_ joined the channel
#
tantek_ why is https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/6 still open?
#
tantek_ spec changes have been made right? what's outstanding?
#
Loqi [tantek] #6 reduce instances when p-name is implied
#
tantek_ alright, commented: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/2#issuecomment-392387875 not sure why I didn't think of this before
#
Loqi [tantek] I would disagree with applying this only to explicit u-photo, I think that would result in a surprise to web authors. The simpler model is to handle "alt" for u-photo regardless of whether it is implicit or explicit. In addition, why shouldn’t it ...