2018-11-09 UTC
[tantek], [manton], sidedoor, Vinmax, gRegorLove, [sebsel], [jgmac1106], nitot, [grantcodes], [tmiller], [eddie], [Vincent] and [Rose] joined the channel
# 16:29 aaronpk the parsers are picking up the alt text as the implied name of the h-card, rather than the text inside the <a> tag # 16:30 sknebel second rule I guess: .h-x>img:only-child[alt]:not([alt=""]):not[.h-*] # 16:30 sknebel since they don't recognize the text as a second child # 16:33 sknebel maybe that's not what the author intended "only-child" to mean, but that's what it means in CSS [jgmac1106] joined the channel
# 16:47 aaronpk this is beyond my skillset so I guess I will file an issue on the parser? # 16:50 sknebel yep. could also check the wiki if there's traces suggesting what it was intended to cover/mean and check if that'd apply with the different interpretation for only child too # 16:51 sknebel although I guess then it'd fall back to textcontent, which would include the alt, so that might need poking too # 16:51 aaronpk (the alt text getting mixed up in the text content thing) [manton] joined the channel
tin and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
# 17:17 sknebel what is "the implied name change"? if you mean the change to not always imply it, no nitot, j12t, [eddie], sebsel, [jgmac1106], [manton] and doubleloop joined the channel
[kevinmarks] This is the implied name change?