2019-12-16 UTC
KartikPrabhu, gRegorLove, [Rose], [jgmac1106], [tantek], chrisaldrich, [Michael_Beckwit, [fluffy], mattgorecki, [dmitshur], [tonz], [xavierroy], mblaney, asymptotically, vendan, strugee, tsrt^, jacky3, [LewisCowles], [snarfed], jgmac1106, [Sadik_Shahadu] and [benatwork] joined the channel
# 21:08 gRegorLove aaronpk, do you have some time this month to review php-mf2 PRs and merge in prep for a new release?
# 21:24 [tantek] are there php-mf2 flagged features that are waiting on mf2 issue resolutions?
jgmac1106 joined the channel
# 21:37 [tantek] e.g. that have a consensus resolution, but perhaps not (enough?) implementation experience
# 21:38 [tantek] I suppose this brings me back to needing labels on mf2 parsing issues to track their state
# 21:39 [tantek] gRegorLove, any insights, suggestions, that you have regarding how to "more efficiently" or "more collaboratively" or "more asynchronously" process and progress mf2 parsing issues are appreciated!
# 22:54 GWG_ gRegorLove: I have a few things on the mf2 list
# 22:58 Loqi [dshanske] #211 ParsefromID should include the element it is Parsing
# 23:00 Loqi [dshanske] #206 Add optional ID for h-* elements
# 23:01 Loqi [dshanske] #46 URLs with fragments should only have the node identified by the fragment and its descendents parsed
# 23:02 Loqi [gRegorLove] #133 Consider adding a version check method
# 23:03 Loqi [dshanske] #136 Add Fallback for Systems without the MBString Extension
# 23:04 gRegorLove might be able to do 211 and 206. I'd like to get the existing PRs merged and see where we're at
# 23:06 GWG_ gRegorLove: I thought we had some of 206, but not a definitive conclusion on fragments
# 23:07 GWG_ By the way, if you are keeping PHP5.4 compatibility for WordPress...it moved to minimum 5.6
# 23:08 gRegorLove Nice. I'm in favor of bumping to 5.6 if there's no objections.
# 23:09 [tantek] GWG, gRegorLove I have some ideas on suggested labels for these issues to keep track of which ones are at what level of consideration
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
# 23:09 aaronpk pretty sure the only reason we were keeping 5.4 compat is for wordpress
# 23:09 gRegorLove I don't at the moment, but happy to read back tonight/tomorrow
# 23:09 [tantek] or should I file a meta issue? (would rather not, as it's not a process change per se, it's more logistics to help implement existing process more smoothly)
# 23:10 GWG_ So, with WordPress at minimum 5.6, I would say you are safe to follow
# 23:10 GWG_ [tantek]: You have my full attention, other than my dinner
[dougbeal] and jgmac1106 joined the channel