ZegnatCan any GitHub org admins check who have access to the tests repo? aaronpk? gRegorLove? I am on the Parser Development team and cannot merge tests
[jgmac1106], [Arne], juju1, gRegorLove, [KevinMarks], [LewisCowles] and [jgarber] joined the channel
[jgarber]Gone down a date parsing/normalization rabbit hole and it’s unclear from the wiki/GitHub/etc. if the community came to an agreement on how to handle normalization, implied dates, etc.
[jgarber]GWG: It _feels_ like a decently-sized gap that could be spanned. The wiki/specs are confusing re: why is date implication/parsing largely documented in the context of value class pattern?
Loqi[gRegorLove] An updated proposal:
>* if the gotten value is a relative-URL string, let `url` be the result of resolving it to an absolute URL following the containing document’s language’s rules (e.g. in HTML, use the current URL context as determined by t...
[tantek]we mostly kept the specs modular as they are to not disrupt the path/understanding of writing classic microformats parsers while we were (more rapidly) iterating on mf2
[tantek]I'm kinda wiped today from CSSWG virtual f2f meeting and other meetings but hopefully I'll have the depth of thinking ability soon to deep dive on mf2 date-time parsing stuff
[tantek]rather than attempting everything back/forth in GitHub comments. also I figure y'all have more free form questions around why things are the way they are, and those are often the best questions (to understand past methodologies, to better document them, and hopefully use them for present/future maintenance)
Loqiaaronpk: Zegnat left you a message 6 days, 6 hours ago: You are listed as maintainer on https://packagist.org/packages/mf2/tests , the package says it will auto-update, but dev-master has been stuck on a 2018 commit so something seems weird?
[KevinMarks]Meeting time poll by event list +rsvps for possibles is a neat idea, but you kind of need a way to tell people which rsvps succeeded. Would that be a webmention back from the event to the rsvps? Would the non-chosen ones become 410s?
[jansauer] ++1
gRegorLove Parser Development should have write access on microformats/tests now
[tantek] rather than attempting everything back/forth in GitHub comments. also I figure y'all have more free form questions around why things are the way they are, and those are often the best questions (to understand past methodologies, to better document them, and hopefully use them for present/future maintenance)
Loqi aaronpk: Zegnat left you a message 6 days, 6 hours ago: You are listed as maintainer on https://packagist.org/packages/mf2/tests , the package says it will auto-update, but dev-master has been stuck on a 2018 commit so something seems weird?
[KevinMarks] Meeting time poll by event list +rsvps for possibles is a neat idea, but you kind of need a way to tell people which rsvps succeeded. Would that be a webmention back from the event to the rsvps? Would the non-chosen ones become 410s?