2020-09-23 UTC
paulrobertlloyd, [snarfed], [tw2113], jamietanna[m], KartikPrabhu, [fluffy], justache, [jeremycherfas], [grantcodes], 94KAASXDU, iwaim, [Ana_Rodrigues], jeremycherfas, [Murray], [James_Gallaghe], [KevinMarks], [Rose], [chrisaldrich] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
[Emma_Humphries], [schmarty], KartikPrabhu, [fluffy], [James_Gallaghe], jeremycherfas, [Murray], jamietanna and timotimo joined the channel
# 19:02 Loqi GWG: [tantek] left you a message 5 days, 18 hours ago: could you take a look at https://github.com/microformats/h-entry/issues/25 and LMK (reacji / comment) if it makes sense to you or if it doesn't, ask question(s)? I'd like to make sure that this method of attempting async h-entry process update proposal / discussion works before filing more such issues (also for anyone else who publishes or implements consuming h-entry, especially if you're
# 19:03 timotimo currently working on mf2 on my ghost blog
# 19:05 timotimo it's going okay i think
# 19:09 timotimo an automatically generated "previous post, next post, related post" section should be its own h-feed i assumo?
# 19:23 timotimo i guess the tags above the title would also want a h-feed of their own
# 19:24 GWG You are marking up related posts as an h-feed?
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
# 19:28 timotimo i was using the pip13 thing
# 19:29 timotimo i think that's the same output
# 19:30 GWG But what is your intent with the h-feed?
# 19:30 timotimo i was mostly thinking putting many h-entry on the same page should have them in a h-feed to logically bundle them
# 19:30 GWG Yes, so the feed represents what?
# 19:30 timotimo but i guess an h-entry with url and uid set to the other address and just leaving out the content would be more correct
# 19:31 GWG The URL is that of a single post, right?
# 19:31 timotimo you mean the page's url or the url the entries link to?
# 19:31 timotimo or the url that the feed currently links to?
# 19:31 timotimo that last one would be the "all posts in the main tag of this post"
# 19:32 timotimo ah, yes, that is the url of one post
# 19:32 timotimo the canonical full url of this post
# 19:32 GWG Okay, so inside the h-entry that represents the post, you need a u-url property that reflects the canonical link...
# 19:32 GWG That ensures consumers know that element is the pagr
# 19:33 timotimo ah, i didn't realize that was missing
# 19:33 GWG As for h-feed, I would suggest it have a p-name of it's own so it can be identified
# 19:33 timotimo would i necessarily turn the title of the post into a u-url / u-uid, or would it be fine to have some invisible element instead?
# 19:33 GWG You seem to have it as h-name accidentally
# 19:34 GWG Invisible is fine for that if you don't have a visible permalink
# 19:34 timotimo ah, i don't have an intuition for the prefixes yet
# 19:34 timotimo would a meta tag make sense for this?
# 19:35 GWG Not really, because meta tags can't have a class
# 19:36 timotimo when i have a link to, say, /tags/foobar, would i turn that link into a h-feed h-url h-uid so that a consumer would know that there's a feed at that url, even when the current page doesn't have any of the entries from the feed in it?
angelenos joined the channel
# 19:37 GWG No. h-feed wouldn't apply on a link
# 19:38 GWG Although some say it is only for the feed of the same page
# 19:38 GWG However, rel-alternate does that right now
# 19:39 GWG This is probably a better definition
# 19:39 GWG u-url would be seen as representing the URL of the element it is inside
# 19:40 timotimo so where-ever i have "the author is timo" i would have a h-card with a u-url of /authors/timo/ inside of it
jeremycherfas and [fluffy] joined the channel
# 19:41 GWG We really should stage an online class
# 19:42 GWG I think we have a session recording from an Indiewebcamp about this
[schmarty] joined the channel
# 19:50 timotimo ok i changed h-name to p-name, i should toss out the h-feed for the related articles, but keep them h-entry?
[Emma_Humphries] joined the channel
# 19:59 timotimo i'm using (or will be using, i guess) whim to do webmentions; is there anything i have to do in particular to make sure i don't get mentions from every post on my site to every other post on my site? i think whim --content is the right way to do that
# 20:00 jmac timotimo: One way to do that in whim is to add your own domain to your blocklist
# 20:00 timotimo oh, that's kind of obvious in hindsight
# 20:01 timotimo how do i get this right, so that wakelift.de doesn't also block completely unrelated site notwakelift.deb
# 20:03 jmac That's a good question and I'll need to look that up myself! (In the meantime we might want to take this to #indieweb-dev or even #whim since this isn't really about microformats per se)
[chrisaldrich], jeremycherfas, Phae, craftyphotons_, twisted`, [snarfed], [LewisCowles], [tb], voxpelli, willnorris, jmac and [schmarty] joined the channel