#microformats 2021-01-10

2021-01-10 UTC
#
@caitlinest ↩️ Sure but are microformats physical copies? They are themselves surrogates, with expensive preservation needs of their own. (twitter.com/_/status/1348059743361896456)
[chrisaldrich], [dmitshur] and [snarfed] joined the channel
#
[snarfed] if an mf2 ’content property is just a string, not {value: …, html: …} as described in https://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2-parsing#parsing_an_e-_property …then that string should be interpreted as plain text, not HTML, right?
#
[snarfed] that would be consistent with other mf2 properties, eg parsing <span class=“p-name”>x > y</a> to “name”: [“x > y”]
#
aaronpk correct
[tw2113_Slack_] and [tantek] joined the channel
#
[tantek] yes
[schmarty], [tw2113_Slack_], rawtext and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#
@azath0th ↩️ Microformats - Semantik für jedermann: Das semantische Web und wie Microformats die Entwicklung vorantreiben werden https://www.amazon.de/Microformats-jedermann-semantische-Entwicklung-vorantreiben/dp/3836492210?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210271777&sr=8-3 (twitter.com/_/status/1348224568926875649)
#
sknebel lol
#
@azath0th ↩️ Well it was, but not much came of it. Microformats still exist, but not to the extend I thought back then. (twitter.com/_/status/1348230679008571394)
sebbu, kira, [Raphael_Luckom], [KevinMarks], KartikPrabhu, [tantek], jamietanna, [snarfed], [Rose], [schmarty], paulrobertlloyd, [Tim_Nolte] and [chrisaldrich] joined the channel