#microformats 2021-08-19

2021-08-19 UTC
charukiewicz, ur5us and gRegor joined the channel
#
[tantek] jacky, see also perhaps related: https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/24
#
Loqi [kartikprabhu] #24 Parsing <noscript> tags
#
KartikPrabhu wait what did I do?
#
[tantek] Looks like the proposal you made has yet to see any prototyping in any parsers so it's stuck at that stage
#
KartikPrabhu oh yeah that makes sensew
#
[tantek] rather, it's achieved the "Broaden implementer consensus" stage in the process and didn't make it passed that
#
[tantek] https://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2-parsing#change_control
#
KartikPrabhu yeah. I proposed that a long time ago
#
KartikPrabhu I guess it is waiting for use-cases which is fair
jacky joined the channel
#
[tantek] yes. or problems with inconsistency across parsers, which is could be worth a test case just to get interop (and avoid future surprises)
#
KartikPrabhu yes a test case would be nice. but that depends on whether the use-cases exist
#
[tantek] ideally yes a test case would be based on a use-case, however as long as the test case(s) reflect the proposal, they're helpful
jacky, hendursaga, Seirdy, ur5us, hoenir, Zegnat[d], corenominal[d], aaronpk[d], lahacker[d], wackycity[d], indieweb-irc-bri, hendursa1, cadeyrn[d], Murray[d], hala-bala[m], DavidWeekes[m], diegov, P[m]1, angelo, Guest5155, gRegor, kimberlyhirsh[d], [schmarty], Ramon[d], KartikPrabhu, capjamesg[d], gRegorLove_, grantcodes[d], yolk, ap, [fluffy] and [snarfed] joined the channel